I appreciate your comments.
We'll my own diagnostic is that I have
a great unbalance: much better in sprints or much worse in distance.
I found the page
http://www.swimnews.com/Ranking/ips.jhtml
with a point calculator, and it yields the idea you said.
But, I think it is not completely accurate for master swimmers who
haven't swum in their childhood. (Me and others started swimming
at 25 y.o.)
We all exhibit such sort of unbalance (better in sprints than in
distance), but in my case is much more important: I beat them
in 100m but they are 40 o 50 seconds faster than me in 800.
I'm guessing if my problem is:
+ technique: people says it looks pretty good, but I suspect it goes
poor when I'm tired
+ train the pace
I train about 15km a week in 5 workouts. I think I have enough
endurance, but for instance I can't do 800 series at 12min. (25m course)
*easily* (say 60%), I have to "suffer" a little more (80-85%)
Well, I'll keep trying
Jordi
Quoted message said:The relationship between your times depends on the type of swimmer you
are. A 1:02 in free seems like you should be able to swim a 4:40 for
the 400, 1:10 should be an easy pace for you to hold up.
Try practicing at that pace more. When I was preparing for a 500, I
wanted a 1:05 pace so that's the pace that I did my workouts at. Ex. 20