Isnt it time to acknowledge that the massive carbon footprint left by swimmers is being conveniently swept under the rug, while cyclists and runners are constantly berated for their supposed environmental transgressions? How can we justify the enormous energy consumption required to heat and maintain swimming pools, not to mention the chemicals used to keep the water clean, when compared to the relatively minor environmental impact of cycling and running? Why do swimmers get a free pass when it comes to environmental concerns, while cyclists and runners are expected to make sacrifices and conform to eco-friendly standards? Can we have a realistic discussion about the environmental factors affecting each sport, without blindly shoving the blame onto the most visible and convenient targets?