Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Compact cranks?

Started by Aramis7 · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,032 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 November 2005
Last activity
13 November 2005
Original author
Aramis7
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,032
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm a bit confused by the compact cranks (50-34 teeth). Do you also need a compact casette to match?. OR they are used stand-alone?

    Whats the main advantage of compacts?

    Thanks

  2. I use an FSA compact crank with Campy cassettes and it works fine with my derailleurs and all of my cassettes. I switched to the compact cranks to get more options at the low end because my cadence was lower than I prefer on some grades. Personally, I like my drivetrain options with the compact cranks, using different cassettes depending on the course.

  3. Aramis7 said:

    I'm a bit confused by the compact cranks (50-34 teeth). Do you also need a compact casette to match?. OR they are used stand-alone?

    Whats the main advantage of compacts?

    Thanks


    The idea behind them is to give you a better range with a standard cassette. without having to go with a triple set-up. There is nothing else needed with them (provided your bottom bracket has the right spindle), although some companies offer a front derailleur made for the compact crank. I understand a regular front derailleur works fine too.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.