General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Coffee labeling can be tricky

Started by Nancree · · Last activity · 4 posts · 318 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 January 2005
Last activity
19 January 2005
Original author
Nancree
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
318
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Lowfat milk comes in

    Quoted message said:

    two basic types: 2 percent , meaning 98 percent of the fat has been removed;

    Nonsense. 2% milk is milk with 2% milk fat, not milk with 98% of the fat
    removed.

    This use of x% fat free is really absurd although it is used commonly in
    advertisements for low fat products, or supposedly low fat products. You
    could advertise whole milk as 96% fat free, obviously not a low fat
    product."
    -----------------------------------------
    The same tricky labeling is used with coffee. De-Caf is advertised as 97%
    caffeine free. Well, coffee beans are already 96 % caffeine free. So you're
    saving yourself a little caffeine, but not much.
    Nancree

  2. : Lowfat milk comes in
    :> two basic types: 2 percent , meaning 98 percent of the fat has been removed;

    Whole cow's milk contains approx. 3.5% fat. Reducing that amount to 2% fat
    is a 43% reduction, not 98%.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Nancree) said:

    The same tricky labeling is used with coffee. De-Caf is advertised as 97%
    caffeine free. Well, coffee beans are already 96 % caffeine free. So you're
    saving yourself a little caffeine, but not much.

    Actually, arabica coffee contains between 0.8-1.4% caffeine (between
    98.6 and 99.2 percent caffeine free). To legally be considered
    decaffeinated, this figure must be further reduced by 97.5%.

    Robusta contains rather more caffeine.

    Indeed, the absolute quantitative difference is small, but the
    difference in physiological effect is significant.

    --
    to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net"

    <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/>

  4. Scott said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Nancree) said:

    The same tricky labeling is used with coffee. De-Caf is advertised


    as 97%

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    caffeine free. Well, coffee beans are already 96 % caffeine free.


    So you're

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    saving yourself a little caffeine, but not much.

    Actually, arabica coffee contains between 0.8-1.4% caffeine (between
    98.6 and 99.2 percent caffeine free). To legally be considered
    decaffeinated, this figure must be further reduced by 97.5%.

    I'm not sure why she felt the need to post the same bogus information
    twice, when a couple minutes research would have told it was incorrect.

    Quoted message said:

    Robusta contains rather more caffeine.

    Indeed, the absolute quantitative difference is small, but the
    difference in physiological effect is significant.

    Right, we're talking milligrams here. Depending on the source beans and
    brewing method, coffee will usually be 100 milligrams per cup or more.
    Decaf is around 5.

    Brian

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.