Road Cycling · Public discussion

"Clinical Denial"

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 1 post · 703 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
20 May 2004
Last activity
20 May 2004
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
703
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From Eurosport:

    'Clinical denial' -Pound

    In an exclusive Eurosportnews interview with World Anti-
    Doping Agency (WADA) president [censored] Pound, the International
    Cycling Union (UCI) came under fire for being one of the
    only sporting federations to not sign the WADA code.

    With less than three months remaining before the Athens
    Games, the UCI still has not signed the WADA code, which
    would threaten to remove cycling as an Olympic sport.

    "The problem with cycling is that they [the UCI] know that
    at least one part of the sport, the professional road racing
    circuit, has a serious problem," Pound told Eurosportnews.
    "And it's that part of the sport that produces most of the
    revenues that keep the UCI going."

    The strict code sets out uniform rules and sanctions
    involving all sports and countries, imposing automatic two-
    year bans for doping violations -- a factor to which UCI
    president Hein Verbruggen opposes.

    "The UCI is reluctant to get into something that may expose
    a rider who tests positive to a two-year suspension..."

    According to Pound, the drug situation has only gotten worse
    in cycling.
    Recent revelations of systematic doping involving the
    Cofidis and Kelme
    teams calling for change in a sport which is gradually
    losing credibility.

    "You would think that cycling would say: 'this is bad for
    our sport. There are constant revelations of systematic
    doping among teams. We've got to clean it up'," Pound said.

    "But instead their approach has been: 'we do more testing
    than anyone else so why are you picking on us'? The fact of
    the matter is that no matter how much testing they're
    doing, they haven't made progress in stamping out doping
    from cycling.

    "There is no indication whatsoever that their is less doping
    than in the past."

    While Pound makes no secret of his strong opinions about
    the UCI's efforts in combating doping, riders and the
    cycling community alike haven't welcomed his criticisms
    with open arms.

    Five times Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong recently
    sent a letter to Pound defending the sport, stating that
    doping was not a major concern in cycling.

    "I am in the face of every other sport just as much as
    cycling," Pound said. "But the problem with cycling is that
    there is this clinical denial of a serious problem.

    "Cycling complains when riders come forward and say 'this is
    what we had to do on our team'. They're dismissed as cranks
    instead of people that actually knew what happened. They are
    the paths to a possible solution!"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.