Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Climb Classifications

Started by chuckles1221 · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,200 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
14 July 2006
Last activity
14 July 2006
Original author
chuckles1221
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,200
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Can someone please provide a link or information regarding how TDF hill climbs are classified?

  2. Its not necessarily a well defined art. Easiest ones to define are HC climbs. They're really long, really steep and make you want to cry just looking at the profile. Beyond that it can be hard to say. Some climbs change catagory (max on up, one down) depending on where they are placed in the stage, how many mountains before them. Basic criteria are length and gradient. The gradient has more weight to it so halving the length but doubling the steepness will probably increase the climbs catagory.

    Most climbs do stay as the same cat each year. Good source of profiles is www.salite.ch which has a massive database. If you're trying to work out what catagory a climb near you is try comparing it to a TdF climb but its not an exact science.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.