"Ken Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:pY9Rc.263551$XM6.76435@attbi_s53...
Quoted message said:Christopher wrote,
"Wrong direction. You see, the point is that the fans should not have that
much influence either way. Your [sic] [Lance] supposed to be a pro, not a
multi-millionaire [censored] that needs to get mad to launch an attack."See what I mean?
Chris definitely knows WHAT IT TAKE to motivate superstar athletes.
Chris's calling Armstrong a "multi-millionaire [censored]" is motivational.Right on man... you're probably right.
-Ken
You know Ken, I was just going to post a "Who is Chris McReynolds?" but you
beat me to it, sort of. Since I don't know who he is, I'm gonna give him a
chance to reply...
Chris:
You are quite the prolific poster, usually in response to other people, and
you seem to have strong opinions and try to speak with an authoritative
tone. My dilemma is whether or not to read your posts because there are so
damn many of them. Now, you probably don't give a damn whether I do or
don't, but I bet I'm not alone here. So here's my question: what is your
background and why should I (or anyone) read and respect your opinions? I'm
not trying to be confrontational with you--though I don't really care--but
I've seen you rag on people for not putting up "evidence" to support his/her
viewpoint and then I see you make blanket statements w/o backup, e.g., like
a lot of Pros being poor descenders. Now, if I knew you had a lot of
experience descending with Pros, then I would accept your comments. But I
don't know that. So, who exactly are you?
Thanks,
Mark