Road Cycling · Public discussion

Checkmate, Atheists!

Started by Cliff · · Last activity · 196 posts · 2,828 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 November 2007
Last activity
11 December 2007
Original author
Cliff
Posts
196
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,828
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 196
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    So tell me - in what book is there some FACTS about the Big Bang.

    Well, most of my astronomy books dispassionately note the increasing red
    shift of distant galaxies. This isn't a supposition or a theory or an
    hypothesis - it's a simple, repeatable, verifiable observation.

    Then - the Big Bang is a purty dam' good explanation for same. Doesn't
    involve superstition.

    Got a better explanation for that red shift? (*Without* invoking imaginary
    sky people!)

    --
    Jeff R.

  2. Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

    "Frank J Warner" <[email hidden]> wrote in messagenews:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Most atheists don't say that at all. They say, if there is a God, it's
    up to you to provide evidence of such. Until then, it's within my
    rights to lack belief in one. It's the default position.

    The more a real scientist learns about the world around him the more
    convinced he becomes that there must be a God. So I guess that neatly
    catagorizes your beliefs.

    Some scientists go that way, some (Dawkins is probably the most well
    known example) go the other. Whatever you think of his books, Dawkins
    has done some good work.

    Quoted message said:

    You are entitled to believe anything you like. Though I am reminded of
    "higher science" which talks about the string theories and the origins of
    the universe in terms which could NEVER be verified in any manner. Why, you
    just have to have faith.

    String theory right now is something of an embarrasment to physicists:
    the big aim is to either show that it's so general that it really
    can't make predictions (i.e. isn't more than a potentially useful
    framework into which a theory might be built) or to find a testable
    prediction which it makes (i.e. it is a valid theory itself) and test
    it.

    But right now, yes, believing in string theory really is just a matter
    of faith: and far too many string theorists do behave like religious
    fundamentalists (Lubos Motl) when their belief is challenged.

    Quoted message said:

    By all means Frank tell me that you have a degree in mathematics and you
    actually understand the math behind the theory of the universe and aren't
    taking it purely on faith.

    I _do_ have a degree in mathematics, and so I can tell you that isn't
    enough to understand most of the mathematics in question. Most
    theoretical physicists, even, only understand bits of the mathematics
    - string theorists should know that maths, but theoretical physicists
    who don't like string theory (and there are a fair few) may not have
    bothered to learn all of it; you only have so much time, and if
    there's a different bit of maths you think might work better, you'll
    be familiar with that.

    For what it's worth, my take on this is:

    I do not personally have a formal religious belief (i.e. I don't see
    any reason to believe in Jesus and Heaven or Allah or whatever). But
    I'm not going to object to anyone with such a belief as long as they
    aren't preaching anti-scientific [censored] (Creationism, mainly) which I do
    object to.

    I think atheism is thoroughly stupid. A theist believes that there is
    a God, et cetera. He can't prove any of what he believes in, but there
    is some potential that he might be proved right (if the trumpets sound
    and the dead are resurrected incorruptible, then there really isn't
    going to be so much argument...). An atheist believes there is no God
    - and he is going to prove this how? Because nothing happens? But
    typically he will argue that Science Proves There Is No God - well,
    science says no such thing.

    I think agnosticism (i.e. I don't believe but I am not going to waste
    time arguing) is a reasonable position: so again I won't argue with an
    agnostic (but then they won't argue with me in the first place, so...)

    For me, I don't believe the Universe just appeared from nothing with
    no First Cause: but I'd much rather believe in a God-the-Artist who
    gives a few rules and sets into motion this vast and beautiful machine
    producing life and all that goes with it than a God-the-Autocrat who
    goes interfering with his creation every time something happens he
    doesn't like.

    Pete

  3. Ed Huntress said:


    "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    That's a pretty big subject. Maybe you shoud read a book or somethig?

    I have read all the books in about a half dozen libraries. I have several
    hundred books in my home. I have gotten rid of thousands of books as well.

    Ha-ha! Which ones did you get rid of?

    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida

  4. "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Ed Huntress said:


    "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    >
    > That's a pretty big subject. Maybe you shoud read a book or somethig?

    I have read all the books in about a half dozen libraries. I have
    several
    hundred books in my home. I have gotten rid of thousands of books as
    well.

    Ha-ha! Which ones did you get rid of?

    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    LOL! That makes more sense. I wondered how he had time to eat and sleep if
    he'd read all the books in six libraries. Perhaps they were the pre-school
    type.

    --
    Ed Huntress

  5. "J. Nielsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:15:58 -0800, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>

    Quoted message said:

    Spin that one, Einstein...

    Next you'll be telling me that REAL(tm) scientists would answer such a
    survey.

  6. "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    Want to compare W2's?

    Quoted message said:

    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.

    Well, at least you've got a little more guts than most of the others
    preaching science around here. That still only puts you on a level playing
    field with most of the smart guys here.

  7. "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    Want to compare W2's?

    Wait, wait. You've read all the books in a half-dozen libraries, and you
    hold down a job?

    Let's see...the average small-town library holds 35,000 volumes (2.8 per
    capita, in case your town is very small; the average university library
    holds 384,000, but we'll cut you a break here). Without knowing your age,
    let's say you're 63 and you started reading at adult speed at age 3. You
    read seven days/week. That means you have to read an average of 9.6 books
    per day.

    Are you a nuclear-plant security guard, by any chance? d8-)

    --
    Ed Huntress

  8. Frank J Warner said:

    In article <01c828fe$c89d10c0$5c92c3d8@race>, <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Frank J Warner <[email hidden]> wrote in article
    <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    300 years was merely a number I plucked out of the air.

    Finally.....!!!!!

    A liberal athiest who reveals the "unimpeachable source" of his facts and
    figures.

    I plucked it out of the air because there is no set date when science
    "began." And you dishonestly snipped my reason for choosing it.

    What makes you think I'm liberal? Or is that just your general epithet
    for everything you don't understand or don't like?

    -Frank

    He's using the Reaganite definition: Liberal: "all who are not
    Republican enough."

    (To be precise, Reagan usually referred to "the L-word"😉

    Dan

  9. Quoted message said:
    In misc.survivalism Frank J Warner said:

    In my neck
    of the woods, the world was created by the sky fox and the earth
    lizard.

    You are nuts. The world was created by the Lady of the Skirt of Snakes.

    "In the beginning there was this Turtle, and the Turtle was alone..."

    Dan

  10. "Trevor Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:WGP_i.36282$h57.16606@edtnps89...

    I am not replying to anyone in particular. I have read some of the postings
    and thought I would say a few things.

    I think it's rather odd that atheism was ruled by the supreme court as a
    religion in 1961.

    http://www.dakotavoice.com/200508/20050820_1.asp

    The Supreme Court has said that a religion need not be based on a belief in
    the existence of a supreme being. In the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins,
    the Court described "secular humanism" as a religion.

    I also find the think soy's of people who claim to be Christian's
    disturbing, since what they are writing as fact is not really. Christian's
    are supposed to read the bible.

    2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that
    needed not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. KJV

    Science and the bible complement one another. Where the bible talks about
    things centuries before it's proven by science.

    In Astronomy the bible says in Proverbs 8:27 written between 1033-975 B.C.
    Proverbs 8:27 "When He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep," NASB

    Another example is in Isaiah 40:22 which is written about 745-695 B.C.
    Where the earth is described as a circle or ball.

    Isaiah 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, KJV

    Aristotle believed the earth to be round in shape, because ships disappear
    over the horizon and the shape of the earth on the moon during an eclipse
    seen on the moon. 384-322 B.C. To bad only his students believed the
    evidences he presented.

    In 1520 A.D. the earth was still believed to be flat until the voyages of
    Columbus and Magellan along with the introduction of the compass.

    The bible says the earth isn't supported or not sitting on anything. Job
    26:7 says the earth hangs on nothing written about 2000 B.C. Yet the history
    of science still believed in the Ptolemy system, which says the earth was
    rigidly supported and all movement was in the heavens. This is before 1543
    A.D. Remember in grade school they told us that before Columbus if you went
    to far out you would fall off the edge of the earth.

    Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the
    earth upon nothing. KJV

    You can find many examples of science written in the bible on the subjects
    of astronomy, geology, oceanography, meteorology, physics, biology and
    archaeology. There are many books written showing the bible to give
    scientific fact centuries before science proved bible facts were indeed
    true. One of them is "HAS GOD SPOKEN" written by an engineer A. O. Schnabel.
    You can buy this book on the web if you do a search for it.

    A lot of people talk about dinosaurs and man living at the same time on the
    earth. We have a bible account in Job describing a large animal that Job had
    seen which bends his tail like a cedar. If there are other examples of this
    I haven't found them yet.

    Job 40:15-17

    15 "Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you;
    He eats grass like an ox.
    16 "Behold now, his strength in his loins,
    And his power in the muscles of his belly.
    17 "He bends his tail like a cedar ;
    The sinews of his thighs are knit together. NASB

    I have not found an honest Preacher who would give a date of how old the
    earth is. The bible doesn't say exactly. Some count the genealogies to
    arrive at a date of the earth, yet what does the bible say about that.

    1Timothy 1:3-5 As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at
    Ephesus, in order that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange
    doctrines, 4 nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which
    give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering the administration of
    God which is by faith.
    NASB

    Many Jews converted to Christianity by the thousands as written in the
    book of Acts. In James 1:1 it say's "to the twelve tribes". Which is a way
    of honoring those Jews who converted to Christ. The old testament shows how
    God dealt with the Jews every time they turned from him to worship other
    gods. The old testament has about 350 prophecies pointing to Jesus the
    Christ, which is the one the Jews were waiting to come. The promise of
    salvation was made to the Jews first, then everyone else.

    Romans 1:16-17
    For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation
    to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
    NASB

    This verse is a quote from Jesus showing there is no male or female in
    heaven, but we are like the angels. What was that nonsense about getting a
    bunch of virgins in the after life?

    Matthew 22:30-31
    "For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but
    are like angels in heaven. NASB

    This verse shows that the devil has his own angels.

    Matthew 25:41
    "Then He will also say to those on His left, 'Depart from Me, accursed ones,
    into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels ;
    NASB

    This verse shows what happens to those who do not confess and follow Jesus
    the Christ.

    Luke 12:8-9
    "And I say to you, everyone who confesses Me before men, the Son of Man
    shall confess him also before the angels of God; 9 but he who denies Me
    before men shall be denied before the angels of God.
    NASB

    Angels who sin will be cast into hell.

    2 Peter 2:4-5
    For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell
    and committed them to pits of darkness, reserved for judgment;
    NASB

    There is a lot to know about God and Jesus and the only way to know is to
    read the bible. If you do that you will see that it takes more than lip
    service to God to get to heaven and by what I have read many who claim to be
    Christians will not make it, unless they study their bible and do what it
    says. Remember that the devil not only believes in GOD, but has spoken to
    him and where is he going to spend eternity. So where does your belief only
    leave you?

    The promise is to those who believe and are baptized into Christ and
    continue in the faith.

    Mark 16:16-17
    "He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved; but he who has
    disbelieved shall be condemned.
    NASB

    Jude 3-4
    Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common
    salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend
    earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints. 4
    For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand
    marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our
    God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.
    NASB

    The bible says you are to study to show yourself approved of GOD. Nowhere
    can you find anyone who prayed their way to heaven like in the believers
    prayer. You should pray for guidance to find you way. You cannot find a
    passage that says the preacher can study for you. You must do it yourself.

    2 Timothy 2:15-16Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that
    needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.16 But shun
    profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
    KJV

    Richard W.

  11. "Richard W." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Trevor Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:WGP_i.36282$h57.16606@edtnps89...

    I am not replying to anyone in particular. I have read some of the
    postings and thought I would say a few things.

    I think it's rather odd that atheism was ruled by the supreme court as a
    religion in 1961.

    http://www.dakotavoice.com/200508/20050820_1.asp

    The Supreme Court has said that a religion need not be based on a belief
    in the existence of a supreme being. In the 1961 case of Torcaso v.
    Watkins, the Court described "secular humanism" as a religion.

    Your source has misread Torcaso, Richard. You're talking about a comment in
    Footnote 11 of the case, in which the Court referred to an earlier case that
    involved a "secular humanist" community that professed certain philosophical
    positions and that wanted to be given the rights of an organized religion.

    But Torcaso was specifically about the right to non-belief, and both
    non-belief (atheism) and beliefs that did not involve God (Buddhism, secular
    humanism) were both included.

    In no way did the Court equate atheism with secular humanism. You should
    read the case for yourself instead of reading those Cliff's Notes versions
    that the religious propagandists promote.

    Here's the case:

    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=367&invol=488#f10

    --
    Ed Huntress

  12. "Ed Huntress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Let's see...the average small-town library holds 35,000 volumes

    Let's just say that you're out of your league and I suggest you learn
    something other than stupidity. Small libraries with 1000 volumes are the
    rule EVERYWHERE. And there are many large libraries now that don't hardly
    have that many books. Seems the information age has made books not very
    stylish.

    But keep trying. I'll bet that someday you'll learn that you aren't as smart
    as you thought you were.

  13. Stupidity seems almost too common.

    By ALL means tell us the difference between "common theory" and "scientific
    theory" for, say, String Theory.

  14. "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ed Huntress" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Let's see...the average small-town library holds 35,000 volumes

    Let's just say that you're out of your league and I suggest you learn
    something other than stupidity. Small libraries with 1000 volumes are the
    rule EVERYWHERE.

    I don't quote figures like that unless I've done my homework first, Tom. You
    should have clarified that you're talking about really *teeny* libraries.
    <g>

    The 2.8 per capita figure for public libraries comes the National Center for
    Education Statistics. The number actually is closer to 2.9 if you round up:

    http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/Vol_4/4_3/5_1.asp

    If you really get your dander up and want to see the details, they're here:

    http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002344.pdf

    You'll note (page 61) that the smallest category of municipal libraries,
    those in towns and villages of less than 1000 population, have an average of
    8,464 books in their collections.

    So, I don't know where you get your "1000 volumes" figure. I had roughly
    that number in my home before I cleaned house a few years ago.

    Well, that's not accurate. I *do* know where you got your 1000 volumes
    figure: you pulled it out of your ass. d8-)

    --
    Ed Huntress

  15. In misc.survivalism Frank J Warner said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    In misc.survivalism Frank J Warner said:

    In my neck
    of the woods, the world was created by the sky fox and the earth
    lizard.

    You are nuts. The world was created by the Lady of the Skirt of Snakes.

    Quoted message said:

    You have me there! I am completely nuts!

    Quoted message said:

    Does she ever take that damn skirt off?

    Dunno. I'll check Wikipedia.

    --
    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
    certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
    -- Bertrand Russel

  16. On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:50:40 -0800, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Spin that one, Einstein...

    Quoted message said:

    Next you'll be telling me that REAL(tm) scientists would answer such a
    survey.

    Why not? Surely, REAL(tm) scientists would be interested in the
    outcome of such a survey as well, otherwise they wouldn't be scientists,
    - at least not in my book - but then again, I could be wrong about what
    characterize a REAL (tm) © ® scientist. Perhaps you could share your
    definition?

    Of course, I could do a BottleBob survey in one of the science groups,
    but since you already made it clear REAL (tm) © ® scientists are
    reluctant to participate in surveys, I'm afraid it would paint a false
    picture 😉
    --

    -JN-

  17. Tom Kunich said:


    "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    Want to compare W2's?

    Sure! Mine is zero. I was recently declared 100% disabled, and the
    VA doesn't provide a W2.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.

    Well, at least you've got a little more guts than most of the others
    preaching science around here. That still only puts you on a level playing
    field with most of the smart guys here.

    I have had several EEs want to know why I don't have a degree, after
    I not only pointed out design flaws, but documented them, and wrote up a
    solution, along with either a in house stock number, or a proposed
    vendor to supply the needed components. My title was Production Test
    Technician, but I worked in every area of the company, except
    accounting, sales and shipping. The last job I was assigned, was to work
    with a team of engineers to take a prototype of an $80,000 DSP based
    telemetry package from them, and prepare it for manufacturing. I was
    part of the team that built a communications system for the ISS, and a
    complete turn key earth station for NOAA to track their LEO satellites.
    I have worked as a broadcast engineer in AM & TV, and built one station
    from scratch.

    As far as science and faith, I am a Christian, and I have my battles
    with those who make silly claims about the bible that they claim
    contradict science. I wrote a sci-fi trilogy about 20 years ago,
    because I couldn't find anything worth reading. Someone demanded to
    know how I could do it in "good faith", because the bible stated that
    there was no other life in the universe. I asked for the book, chapter
    and verse they were referring to. It's been 20 yeas, and they still
    haven't found their proof.

    Just because there is no design for an inter-galactic space ship in
    the bible, that doesn't make it anti-science. 🙂

    --
    Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
    prove it.
    Member of DAV #85.

    Michael A. Terrell
    Central Florida

  18. "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Kunich said:


    "Michael A. Terrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The one's that he'd already colored? After all, there isn't much
    space on the refrigerator to stick all of them.

    Want to compare W2's?

    Sure! Mine is zero. I was recently declared 100% disabled, and the
    VA doesn't provide a W2.

    Sorry to hear you're disabled Michael. But what would make you write
    something like that?

    Quoted message said:

    I have had several EEs want to know why I don't have a degree, after
    I not only pointed out design flaws, but documented them, and wrote up a
    solution, along with either a in house stock number, or a proposed
    vendor to supply the needed components. My title was Production Test
    Technician, but I worked in every area of the company, except
    accounting, sales and shipping.

    Would it surprise you to learn that I had a similar history and have been a
    non-degreed engineer for some 30 years?

    Quoted message said:

    As far as science and faith, I am a Christian, and I have my battles
    with those who make silly claims about the bible that they claim
    contradict science. I wrote a sci-fi trilogy about 20 years ago,
    because I couldn't find anything worth reading. Someone demanded to
    know how I could do it in "good faith", because the bible stated that
    there was no other life in the universe. I asked for the book, chapter
    and verse they were referring to. It's been 20 yeas, and they still
    haven't found their proof.

    Just because there is no design for an inter-galactic space ship in
    the bible, that doesn't make it anti-science. 🙂

    I was raised a Catholic but haven't really followed religion since my teens.
    I haven't found anything in science that contradicts religion and even
    Einstein said as much himself. But then these fools around here that don't
    have the background to understand the disputed differences still claim that
    science has "facts" behind it. I wonder what they would think if they
    actually understood the science they were discussing.

  19. "Joseph Gwinn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Are you aware that the present theories can't explain why the Sun doesn't
    produce enough neutrinos? If something as basic as that can't be
    explained
    what the hell makes you think that any of it has a sound footing?

    Actually, the neutrino deficit problem has been solved, although it took
    something like thirty or forty years.

    It turns out that neutrinos have a very tiny mass, which causes them to
    change between the three types that exist, so a beam of one kind will
    soon become an equal mixture of the three kinds. (I don't pretend to
    understand the math and physics, but I think someone got a Nobel Prize
    for solving the "solar neutrino problem".) The original detectors of
    solar neutrinos only responded to one kind, and so saw only 1.3 of the
    expected flux.

    Results 1 - 10 of about 114,000 for solar neutrino problem, nobel. (0.15
    seconds)

  20. Tom Kunich said:

    I was raised a Catholic but haven't really followed religion since my
    teens. I haven't found anything in science that contradicts religion and
    even Einstein said as much himself. But then these fools around here
    that don't have the background to understand the disputed differences
    still claim that science has "facts" behind it. I wonder what they would
    think if they actually understood the science they were discussing.

    They are people deluded by pseudoreligonist politicians or good old
    fashioned con men (the difference is that con men want to enrich
    themselves, politicians want the power garnered by having people in
    their thrall).

    Dan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.