Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Cervelo Soloist help?

Started by psycholist · · Last activity · 2 posts · 457 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2005
Last activity
7 June 2005
Original author
psycholist
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
457
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm about to order a Cervelo Soloist by mail order. I've been researching
    frame sizes/geometry compared to my Trek 5500.

    My Trek is a 52cm with a 53.1 cm eff. top tube and a 12.5 cm stem.

    The 51 cm Soloist has a 53.0 cm eff. top tube and, if I get a 12.5 cm stem,
    I should be very close to the "cockpit" I'm accustomed to. However, the
    salesman tells me I'd be better off on a 54 cm Soloist. That has a 54.5 cm
    eff top tube and comes with a 11 cm stem. So far it seems like a toss-up.

    The Cervelo website encourages you to compare a couple of measures they call
    "reach" and "stack" between your existing bike and the Soloist frame. Reach
    is a dead-on match with the 51 cm Soloist, and stack is closer than it would
    be with the 54 cm frame.

    I'm long-torso'd and short-legged. The standover on a 54 cm compact frame
    wouldn't give me much clearance. That's not a big concern 'cuz I don't have
    much now. But I'm not riding a compact frame now, either. All my instincts
    are telling me the 54 cm is too large. But that's what the salesman/"fit
    expert" is pushing. (He has both frame sizes in stock, so it's not like he's
    trying to steer me to what's on the floor.) I'd say the choice to go with
    the 51 cm would be a no-brainer except for one thing. Cervelo ships the 51
    cm with a 10 cm stem. I'll have to swap that for a 12.5. Not a big deal
    unless there's some handling compromise or something I need to take into
    consideration. On the other hand, the 54 cm ships with an 11 cm stem which
    puts the combined top tube and stem length precisely where my current bike
    is (despite those "reach" and "stack" measures which are significantly
    different).

    Please resist the "go ride it" advice. There's not a Cervelo Soloist to be
    ridden within several hours drive time of where I live. I'm in a remote,
    rural area.

    Do I go with the smaller bike and the longer stem? Or, do I go with the
    larger bike and the "stock" stem?

    Thanks in advance for any wisdom.

    Bob C.

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  2. Quoted message said:

    Do I go with the smaller bike and the longer stem? Or, do I go with the
    larger bike and the "stock" stem?

    Intuitively, 12.5cm seems like a pretty long stem for a 51cm bike. 11cm on
    the 54 sounds a bit more reasonable. As for clearance, I don't see that as a
    huge issue on a road bike. On the other hand, Treks are a bit smaller (in
    terms of seat tube length/top tube height) than their size indicates, due to
    how they measure.

    You're right, this *is* a tough one to figure out.

    Quoted message said:

    Please resist the "go ride it" advice. There's not a Cervelo Soloist to be
    ridden within several hours drive time of where I live. I'm in a remote,
    rural area.

    Might be worth the investment in time, given how long you're going to own
    the bike. I know, it's not what you wanted to hear...

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm about to order a Cervelo Soloist by mail order. I've been researching
    frame sizes/geometry compared to my Trek 5500.

    My Trek is a 52cm with a 53.1 cm eff. top tube and a 12.5 cm stem.

    The 51 cm Soloist has a 53.0 cm eff. top tube and, if I get a 12.5 cm
    stem, I should be very close to the "cockpit" I'm accustomed to. However,
    the salesman tells me I'd be better off on a 54 cm Soloist. That has a
    54.5 cm eff top tube and comes with a 11 cm stem. So far it seems like a
    toss-up.

    The Cervelo website encourages you to compare a couple of measures they
    call "reach" and "stack" between your existing bike and the Soloist frame.
    Reach is a dead-on match with the 51 cm Soloist, and stack is closer than
    it would be with the 54 cm frame.

    I'm long-torso'd and short-legged. The standover on a 54 cm compact frame
    wouldn't give me much clearance. That's not a big concern 'cuz I don't
    have much now. But I'm not riding a compact frame now, either. All my
    instincts are telling me the 54 cm is too large. But that's what the
    salesman/"fit expert" is pushing. (He has both frame sizes in stock, so
    it's not like he's trying to steer me to what's on the floor.) I'd say the
    choice to go with the 51 cm would be a no-brainer except for one thing.
    Cervelo ships the 51 cm with a 10 cm stem. I'll have to swap that for a
    12.5. Not a big deal unless there's some handling compromise or something
    I need to take into consideration. On the other hand, the 54 cm ships with
    an 11 cm stem which puts the combined top tube and stem length precisely
    where my current bike is (despite those "reach" and "stack" measures which
    are significantly different).

    Please resist the "go ride it" advice. There's not a Cervelo Soloist to be
    ridden within several hours drive time of where I live. I'm in a remote,
    rural area.

    Do I go with the smaller bike and the longer stem? Or, do I go with the
    larger bike and the "stock" stem?

    Thanks in advance for any wisdom.

    Bob C.

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.