Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

canti, new or old

Started by gerrit van wijk · · Last activity · 2 posts · 637 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
26 May 2004
Last activity
26 May 2004
Original author
gerrit van wijk
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
637
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Do the newer type canti-brakes (tektro oryx/avid shorty/shimano br-r550)
    have an advantage over the older low profile type canti-brakes?

  2. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    In article <yZ7tc.11218$CM5.50817@zonnet-reader-1>,

    gerrit van wijk said:

    Do the newer type canti-brakes (tektro oryx/avid shorty/shimano br-r550)
    have an advantage over the older low profile type canti-brakes?

    _ The newer ones have two advantages.

    1. They aren't as wide to avoid problems clearance
    problems with panniers and clipping your heels.

    2. Easier ( IMHO ) to adjust with threaded ball and socket
    v-brake type pads.

    _ The older ones like these

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/cantilevers/index.html

    are wider which has some advantages as outlined in this
    article.

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cantilever-geometry.html

    _ Personally, with an unlimited budget I'd get these

    http://www.paulcomp.com/frmbk.html

    Old school geometry with the ease of V-brake pad
    style adjustment, relatively expensive though.

    _ Booker C. Bense

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.2

    iQCVAwUBQLUlFGTWTAjn5N/lAQFRwAQAnWnd/yEDY1U46OsOhx+iw094pDsbTpf+
    2eOFhgpgRbHMTabLRQrsODN6PmFdaa9/lad/7tyHqDA3Ia1Rjo0UCOCLJiZjrr0g
    PSP1RRX8MYGxBOvKhAyxUcCeXZmT4CcMEoYkCv2DC851nLl5BsEOqzW71BacKOUi
    hAmQ3yJMJMc=
    =PmyA
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.