(Jan) said:Taken from quack quack.
*Scientists look at facts.*
OOOps. With amalgams, they go by record, one that does not include all the
unanswered health problems.
IOW quack quack is a liar.
Of course Jan calls nearly anyone who disagrees with her opinion a
liar. And she rarely if ever proves her claims despite her assertion
that she does.
The truth is that with respect to amalgams, it is Jan Drew who lied
repeatedly. And she lied repeatedly in order to convince others that
she really had mercury poisoning when in truth she did not. She is
either delusional or a shill (or both).
Jan Drew said that the reason she felt better than she had in two
years is because she was relieved that all her dental work was done
and her bill was paid off. But in Jan's OWN WORDS, when she said that
she felt better than she had in two years she did NOT have all the
dental work done and actually had more amalgams to be removed. And
these amalgams were removed *weeks* later.
Jan Drew said that she knows that it was the mercury that caused her
problem because she did not *begin* to regain her health until *after*
her mercury level dropped. But this is *also* a complete lie and it is
proven by Jan Drew's own words. Within hours of having *some* of her
amalgams out she said she felt better than she had in two years.
Clearly she was regaining her health (especially considering that days
before she thought she was close to death) far before any reduction in
mercury level.
Jan Drew also lied when she said on June 26, 1999 that the reason that
she was able to go out line dancing a week after some amalgams were
removed was because she was no longer getting a daily dose of mercury.
This assertion suggests that ALL her amalgams were removed. But they
were not all taken out until July 11, 1999. And obviously Jan Drew
knew on June 26th that she had more amalgams to be removed. But she
lied in order to make her claim about mercury poisoning more credible.
But even if she did have all the amalgams out, a week later her
mercury level would likely be the highest in her entire life since a
massive amount of mercury was released when her amalgams were removed.
The above has been repeatedly pointed out to Jan Drew. She does not
dispute any of it. Instead she *falsely* accuses *me* of lying but
does not identify a single lie that she alleges I told. The only time
she did identify what she thought was a lie was when I mistakenly
posted January instead of June. I immediately acknowledged the error
but Jan is so desperate to discredit those who debunk her claims that
she lies about others lying. Sad that.
If Jan responds to this post it is an absolute certainty that she will
not defend her statements but instead will try to attack me. In fact
if anyone responds to this post Jan Drew will use the opportunity to
try to discredit me by starting a new post to discredit me or trash me
directly in response to someone responding to me.
But Jan Drew will NEVER reconcile her contradictory statements since
she is an unrepentant liar who tries to take the high moral ground
claiming to be a devout Christian. But her continuing to lie and bear
false witness even when it is pointed out to her directly indicates
that she has absolutely no respect for the Ten Commandments.
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Jan
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance.
