In 1994, Robinson and two colleagues summarized the results of four mouse studies he had carried out while working at the Pauling Institute [20]. Nearly all of the mice developed skin cancers (squamous cell carcinomas) following exposure to ultraviolet radiation Altogether, 1,846 hairless mice received a total of 38 different diets. The researchers found that (a) the rate of onset and severity of tumors could be varied as much as 20-fold by just modifying dietary balance; (b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth; and (c) no cures or remissions were observed (although the researchers were not looking for this). In 1999, Robinson commented:
(b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth.
Has anyone got any similar results showing that nutrition inbalance has inhibitory effects on cancer?
In 1994, Robinson and two colleagues summarized the results of four mouse studies he had carried out while working at the Pauling Institute [20]. Nearly all of the mice developed skin cancers (squamous cell carcinomas) following exposure to ultraviolet radiation Altogether, 1,846 hairless mice received a total of 38 different diets. The researchers found that (a) the rate of onset and severity of tumors could be varied as much as 20-fold by just modifying dietary balance; (b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth; and (c) no cures or remissions were observed (although the researchers were not looking for this). In 1999, Robinson commented:
(b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth.
Has anyone got any similar results showing that nutrition inbalance has inhibitory effects on cancer?
Thanks
Anth
Give the mice a messed up diet that inhibits all normal cellular growth
and
Quoted message said:
the cancer cells don't grow as fast either. This is not rocket science.
r
PS. Pauling was a nut when it came to Vit. C. If his theory about VIt. C was correct, why did he die of cancer even though he took megadoses of
Vit.
Quoted message said:
C?
-- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"
In 1994, Robinson and two colleagues summarized the results of four mouse studies he had carried out while working at the Pauling Institute [20]. Nearly all of the mice developed skin cancers (squamous cell carcinomas) following exposure to ultraviolet radiation Altogether, 1,846 hairless mice received a total of 38 different diets. The researchers found that (a) the rate of onset and severity of tumors could be varied as much as 20-fold by just modifying dietary balance; (b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth; and (c) no cures or remissions were observed (although the researchers were not looking for this). In 1999, Robinson commented:
(b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest inhibitory effect on cancer growth.
Has anyone got any similar results showing that nutrition inbalance has inhibitory effects on cancer?
Thanks
Anth
Give the mice a messed up diet that inhibits all normal cellular growth
and
Quoted message said:
the cancer cells don't grow as fast either. This is not rocket science.
r
PS. Pauling was a nut when it came to Vit. C. If his theory about VIt. C was correct, why did he die of cancer even though he took megadoses of
Vit.
Quoted message said:
C?
-- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"
-- "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"
> [20]. Nearly all of the mice developed skin cancers (squamous cell > carcinomas) following exposure to ultraviolet radiation Altogether, > 1,846 hairless mice received a total of 38 different diets. The > researchers found that (a) the rate of onset and severity of tumors > could be varied as much as 20-fold by just modifying dietary balance; > (b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest > inhibitory effect on cancer growth; and (c) no cures or remissions
were
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> observed (although the researchers were not looking for this). In
1999,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Robinson commented: > > (b) diets with the worst balance of nutrients had the greatest > inhibitory effect on cancer growth. > > > > Has anyone got any similar results showing that nutrition inbalance
