Can the eBike be used for bike sharing or rentals?

[mountainbikemad]

Why are eBikes still being considered for bike sharing and rentals when they offer no actual physical benefits to riders and are basically just a crutch for those who cant handle a real workout. Wouldnt it be better to offer regular bikes and actually encourage people to get some exercise. Whats the point of even calling it cycling if youre just going to be propelled by a motor. And dont even get me started on the added weight and maintenance issues, not to mention the environmental impact of all those batteries. Are we really just going to abandon the principles of cycling and turn bike sharing into some lazy, motorized version of itself. And by the way, why should road cyclists care about this, when theyre the ones who are actually putting in the effort and getting a real workout. I mean, have you seen the state of most eBike riders, theyre about as fit as a Sunday driver. Cant we just keep the eBikes out of this and preserve the integrity of actual cycling.

 

[jmovellan]

"Oh, spare me the drama. eBikes have their place, and for those who need a little assist, they're a game-changer. You want to talk about 'real' cycling? Get back to me when you've spent a week in the mountains with the pros."

 

[dinesh123]

Have you ever considered that eBikes can serve as a gateway to traditional cycling? By making cycling more accessible, eBikes can attract individuals who might not have tried it otherwise. As their confidence and fitness levels increase, they may transition to regular bikes. Also, eBikes can be a practical solution for daily commutes, encouraging people to switch from cars to a healthier and more sustainable mode of transportation.

Moreover, eBikes can still provide a workout, albeit different from a traditional bike. The level of assistance can be adjusted, allowing riders to control the intensity of their ride. And let's not forget that any form of physical activity, no matter how small, is beneficial to our health.

Lastly, the environmental impact of eBikes is significantly lower than that of cars, contributing to cleaner cities and healthier lungs for all of us. It's not about abandoning the principles of cycling, but rather embracing a new form that can coexist and even complement the original.

What are your thoughts on eBikes serving as a stepping stone to traditional cycling?

 

[donnie boy]

You're still stuck on this eBike rant, huh? Newsflash: they're not going anywhere. Bike-sharing and rental companies care about one thing: getting people on bikes. If eBikes get more people riding, they'll keep offering them. Your "real workout" argument is irrelevant; most people aren't cyclists, they just want to get from A to B without sweating. And as for environmental impact, have you seen the carbon footprint of most bike manufacturing? Hypocrisy much?

 

[HatePavement]

eBikes in bike sharing programs aren't "abandoning" cycling principles, they're expanding accessibility. Not everyone can handle a strenuous workout, and eBikes still require effort. Plus, they can encourage more people to try cycling, leading to a larger and more diverse cycling community. And let's not forget, eBikes can be just as environmentally friendly as traditional bikes, especially when used for commuting and reducing car usage. So, instead of pitting road cyclists against eBike riders, let's embrace all forms of cycling and the unique benefits they offer. #CyclingCommunityUnited

 

[donnie boy]

eBikes in bike-sharing ain't betraying cycling, they're opening doors. Not everyone's up for a grueling workout, and eBikes still need effort. Fact is, they lure more folks to cycling, growing and diversifying the community. And they can be as green as traditional bikes, especially for commuting. Forget the road cyclist vs eBike rider nonsense. Let's welcome all types of cycling. #CyclingDiversityRocks. But hey, manufacturing impact, right? Ain't that something? Been there, done that.

 

[dinesh123]

Oh, look who's jumping on the bandwagon. Yeah, sure, eBikes are just great, aren't they? They're not betraying cycling, no way. Just 'opening doors' for lazy folks who can't handle a real workout. Because, you know, not everyone wants to gasp for air after a bike ride.

And yeah, let's forget about the whole road cyclist vs eBike rider thing. Let's all hold hands and sing kumbaya. Never mind the fact that eBikes can be as 'green' as traditional bikes, ignoring the extra energy and resources needed for their production and maintenance.

But hey, if you're into that sort of thing, go ahead and welcome all types of cycling. I'm sure the planet will thank you for adding more motorized vehicles on the road. Just don't expect me to cheer for it. Manufacturing impact? Been there, done that. #CyclingHypocrisyParade

 

[HatePavement]

eBikes aren't for everyone, got it. But let's not dismiss them as just for "lazy" folks. They still need effort and can help more people cycle. As for manufacturing impact, sure, it's there, but let's also consider the emissions saved when eBikes replace cars. Just saying.

 

[mountainbikemad]

Why are we pretending eBikes are the saviors of cycling? They turn bike rides into glorified strolls with a motor. Isn’t it just a fancy way to skip leg day? Who needs a workout when you can just cruise?

 

[jmovellan]

C'mon, don't be such a buzzkill. eBikes ain't here to replace traditional cycling, just make it more accessible. You still gotta put in effort, y'know. And for those who can't keep up or need a boost, eBikes level the playing field. You wanna skip leg day, go ahead, but don't hate on eBikes for giving folks a chance to enjoy the ride. Different strokes, different folks, man. Ever tried climbing hills on an eBike? It's still a workout! Peace out.

 

[donnie boy]

Oh, here we go again with the eBike defense. Sure, they make cycling "more accessible," but at what cost? You still gotta put in effort? Yeah, less effort than traditional biking. And sure, it levels the playing field for those who can't keep up, but why not encourage those folks to build up their strength instead?

I've tried climbing hills on an eBike, and yeah, there's some resistance, but it's nothing compared to the real deal. It's like riding a motorized scooter with pedals.

And let's not forget about the environmental impact of eBike manufacturing. It's not a walk in the park, folks. Sure, commuting on an eBike might be greener than driving, but what about all the resources that go into making them in the first place?

Look, I'm all for diversifying the cycling community, but let's not pretend that eBikes are some kind of godsend. They've got their place, but they ain't no replacement for traditional cycling. Let's not water down the sport, alright?

 

[dinesh123]

Hey, no need to be so down on eBikes. Yeah, they're not traditional cycling, but they ain't trying to be. They open up cycling to more people, and that's a good thing. And sure, manufacturing's not perfect, but name something that is. Instead of knocking 'em, how 'bout we help new riders build their strength for traditional cycling? Let's grow the community, not divide it. #EmbraceChangeInCycling

 

[donnie boy]

C'mon, enough with the eBike lovefest. Yeah, they're not traditional, but that's not the point. I get it, they make cycling "accessible," but where's the challenge? And what about the resources spent on manufacturing? It's not like they're made of sunshine and rainbows.

Instead of worshipping eBikes, why not help new riders grow stronger for regular cycling? Let's face it, eBikes are just motorized scooters with pedals. Sure, they get people moving, but they don't compare to the real thing.

And don't get me started on the environmental impact. Yeah, commuting on an eBike might be greener than driving, but have you seen the carbon footprint of eBike manufacturing? It ain't pretty.

Look, I'm all for growing the community, but let's not water it down with eBikes. They've got their place, but they ain't no replacement for traditional cycling. Let's focus on building strength and enjoying the real ride, not taking the easy way out.

 

[mountainbikemad]

Why are we even pretending eBikes belong in bike sharing? They’re a joke. Sure, they say it makes cycling accessible, but does that really matter if it's just a shortcut to laziness? The whole point of cycling is to sweat, to feel the burn. You hop on an eBike, and it’s like cheating.

And let’s talk about the weight. You think lugging that motor around is good for anyone? It's just an excuse for folks to avoid the grind. Plus, the maintenance? A nightmare waiting to happen. Regular bikes are simple, straightforward. eBikes? They're a tech headache.

And don’t even get me started on the environmental cost. Batteries don’t grow on trees. We’re trading one problem for another. So, why are we sacrificing the essence of cycling? Why not push for real bike culture, not this watered-down, motorized nonsense? It’s time we put our foot down and demand better for the cycling community.