Strength training and hill climbing, its a topic thats been done to death, yet we still seem to be stuck in this rut of blindly accepting that hitting the gym is the key to conquering those pesky inclines. But is it really? I mean, think about it, how many of us have spent hours, even days, in the gym, doing squats, lunges, and deadlifts, only to find that when we actually get on the bike, our hill climbing abilities havent improved as much as wed like to think.
Whats more, when we do see improvements, can we really say its down to the strength training, or is it just a result of increased overall fitness and bike time? I mean, lets be real, if youre spending more time on the bike, youre going to get better at climbing hills, regardless of whether youre doing strength training or not. And what about all the other factors that come into play when climbing hills, like bike weight, gearing, and technique? Do we really think that a few extra reps in the gym are going to make a significant difference?
And another thing, what exactly are we trying to achieve with strength training when it comes to hill climbing? Are we trying to increase our power output, or are we just trying to build endurance? Because if its the latter, then surely there are more effective ways to do that, like, I dont know, actually riding a bike up a hill. And if its the former, then how do we know that the strength gains were making in the gym are actually translating to the bike?
Im not saying that strength training cant be beneficial for cyclists, but I do think we need to take a step back and reevaluate our approach to hill climbing. Are we just following the crowd and doing what everyone else is doing, or are we actually taking a thoughtful and scientific approach to improving our performance? Because if its the former, then were just wasting our time.
So, Ill ask the question, can strength training really improve hill climbing abilities, or are we just kidding ourselves? Is it time to rethink our approach and focus on more bike-specific training, or is there something Im missing here?
Whats more, when we do see improvements, can we really say its down to the strength training, or is it just a result of increased overall fitness and bike time? I mean, lets be real, if youre spending more time on the bike, youre going to get better at climbing hills, regardless of whether youre doing strength training or not. And what about all the other factors that come into play when climbing hills, like bike weight, gearing, and technique? Do we really think that a few extra reps in the gym are going to make a significant difference?
And another thing, what exactly are we trying to achieve with strength training when it comes to hill climbing? Are we trying to increase our power output, or are we just trying to build endurance? Because if its the latter, then surely there are more effective ways to do that, like, I dont know, actually riding a bike up a hill. And if its the former, then how do we know that the strength gains were making in the gym are actually translating to the bike?
Im not saying that strength training cant be beneficial for cyclists, but I do think we need to take a step back and reevaluate our approach to hill climbing. Are we just following the crowd and doing what everyone else is doing, or are we actually taking a thoughtful and scientific approach to improving our performance? Because if its the former, then were just wasting our time.
So, Ill ask the question, can strength training really improve hill climbing abilities, or are we just kidding ourselves? Is it time to rethink our approach and focus on more bike-specific training, or is there something Im missing here?