Whats the deal with the blanket statement that wax-based chain lubes are incompatible with recumbent bikes? Is this a myth perpetuated by misinformed enthusiasts or is there actual engineering behind it? Ive scoured the internet and cant seem to find any concrete evidence or credible sources to support this claim.
The argument that recumbent chains are more prone to flex and oscillation, leading to premature wax flaking, seems like a weak excuse. Dont modern wax formulations take into account the high-friction, high-temperature environments found in chainrings and cogs? And what about the touted benefits of wax-based lubes, such as reduced friction, increased durability, and improved corrosion resistance? Dont these advantages outweigh the perceived risks?
Id love to hear from experienced recumbent riders who have successfully used wax-based lubes on their chains. Are there any specific products or techniques that can mitigate the alleged incompatibility issues? Or is this just another case of groupthink dominating the cycling community?
The argument that recumbent chains are more prone to flex and oscillation, leading to premature wax flaking, seems like a weak excuse. Dont modern wax formulations take into account the high-friction, high-temperature environments found in chainrings and cogs? And what about the touted benefits of wax-based lubes, such as reduced friction, increased durability, and improved corrosion resistance? Dont these advantages outweigh the perceived risks?
Id love to hear from experienced recumbent riders who have successfully used wax-based lubes on their chains. Are there any specific products or techniques that can mitigate the alleged incompatibility issues? Or is this just another case of groupthink dominating the cycling community?