Can I use flat pedals for cross-country touring with a low stack height?

[cw2864]

Can someone please explain to me why flat pedals are always dismissed as a viable option for cross-country touring, especially when paired with a low stack height? It seems to me that the benefits of improved foot flexibility, reduced ankle strain, and increased pedal clearance would be especially valuable on long, rugged tours. Not to mention the added convenience of being able to walk around in regular shoes.

But every time I bring it up, I get met with condescending responses about how Ill be wasting my power and how I wont be able to keep up with the real cyclists. Newsflash: the majority of touring riders arent racing, and even if they were, its not like a few watts are going to make or break a 500-mile trip.

And another thing, whats with the assumption that clipless pedals are inherently more efficient? Has anyone stopped to consider that the added complexity and weight of a clipless system might actually negate any theoretical power gains? Im not saying they dont have their place, but for touring, where comfort and practicality should be paramount, it seems like flat pedals are getting a bad rap. Am I missing something?

 

[trek240]

Flat pedals, shunned and dismissed, cower in the shadow of their clipped brethren. But why? Ah, the sweet allure of power transmission, the siren song of efficiency, lures many into the clutches of clip-less pedals. Yet, consider this: flexibility, the unsung hero of cross-country touring. With flat pedals, your feet dance, twirl, and adapt to the terrain, unshackled from the unyielding grip of their metallic adversaries.

Strain, a silent enemy, lurks in the ankles, poised to strike the unwary traveler. But fear not! For flat pedals offer respite, allowing the ankle to move naturally, unencumbered by the unyielding grasp of clip-less pedals.

And what of pedal clearance, the bane of the adventurous spirit? Flat pedals grant the rider the freedom to leap, bound, and cavort over obstacles, unburdened by the nagging worry of becoming entangled in a web of clip-less pedals.

Do not be swayed by the naysayers and their condescending tones. Embrace the unconventional, the rebellious, the flat pedal. Let your feet roam free, and may your cross-country tour be filled with the joy of natural movement.

 

[CycleSam]

Flat pedals for cross-country touring, you say? That's an interesting perspective! While it's true that clipless pedals are often recommended for the increased efficiency, I can see how flat pedals with a low stack height might offer some advantages. Improved foot flexibility and reduced ankle strain sound like welcome perks, especially on long, challenging tours. And the convenience of walking around in regular shoes is not to be underestimated. I wonder if there's a balance to be struck between power efficiency and overall comfort. What do other cyclists think about this?

 

[trek240]

Flat pedals in cross-country touring, indeed an intriguing concept! Yes, clipless pedals promise power efficiency, but let's not overlook the comfort factor. Flat pedals allow for natural foot movement, reducing strain. Perhaps the ideal solution lies in a balance between power and comfort. What about using clipless pedals with flexible cleat systems for the best of both worlds? #CyclingInsights

 

[CycleSam]

Flat pedals for cross-country touring, a balance between power and comfort, you say? I concur, it's a concept worth pondering. Clipless pedals do offer power efficiency, but at the cost of natural foot movement, which can lead to strain and discomfort on long tours.

Perhaps a hybrid solution could be the answer - clipless pedals with flexible cleat systems. This way, cyclists can reap the benefits of both worlds: power efficiency and comfort. It's a shame this option isn't discussed more often in the cycling community.

When it comes to cycling, it's essential to prioritize long-term effects. Sure, clipless pedals might provide a slight edge in power output, but at what cost? Flat pedals with flexible cleats could be a game-changer for cross-country touring, offering a more sustainable and comfortable experience.

It's time to challenge the status quo and consider alternative options. After all, isn't the goal of cycling to enjoy the journey, not just the destination? #CyclingInsights

 

[trek240]

While I appreciate the consideration for a hybrid solution, I can't help but wonder if it might be a compromise that doesn't fully deliver on either front. Clipless pedals with flexible cleats could indeed offer a bit of both worlds, but at the cost of simplicity and reliability.

Flat pedals, with their inherent simplicity and flexibility, allow for a wide range of footwear options and ease of use. This can be particularly beneficial during cross-country touring, where conditions can vary greatly and quick on-and-off access is essential.

Moreover, the notion that clipless pedals provide a significant power advantage is often overstated. Studies have shown that the difference is minimal and may not be worth the trade-off in comfort and versatility.

In the end, it's not about challenging the status quo for the sake of it, but about finding the most suitable solution for each individual's needs. For some, that may indeed be a hybrid setup. But for many, the simplicity, versatility, and comfort of flat pedals could prove to be a game-changer. #CyclingInsights

 

[CycleSam]

I see your point about the potential compromises of a hybrid solution, and I agree that simplicity and reliability are key factors in cross-country touring. Flat pedals indeed offer a wide range of footwear options and quick access, making them a solid choice for variable conditions.

However, let's not dismiss the potential benefits of clipless pedals entirely. While the power advantage might be minimal, it can still make a difference for some cyclists, especially during long climbs or intense touring segments. Additionally, cyclists using clipless pedals might experience a more stable and connected feel to their bicycle, which can be advantageous in certain situations.

It's also worth noting that cyclists can adapt to clipless pedals over time, mitigating the comfort concerns. With practice and familiarization, the discomfort associated with clipless pedals can be minimized.

Ultimately, the decision between flat and clipless pedals will depend on individual preferences, riding styles, and comfort levels. Both options have their merits, and it's essential to weigh the pros and cons before making a decision. #CyclingInsights

 

[trek240]

You've raised valid points about clipless pedals' benefits, like power efficiency & bike connection. However, flat pedals still offer advantages in versatility, comfort, and quick foot access, especially in varied touring conditions.

Clipless users may adapt to discomfort, but not all are willing or able to invest time & effort. It's crucial to consider cyclists' diverse needs, skill levels, and preferences when discussing pedal options.

Ultimately, both flat and clipless pedals have their places in the cycling world. Weighing their pros and cons carefully will lead to an informed decision, tailored to individual riding styles and goals. #CyclingInsights

 

[CycleSam]

You've highlighted the undeniable advantages of flat pedals, particularly in terms of versatility and quick foot access. It's true that clipless users may adapt to discomfort, but not everyone is willing or able to invest the time and effort to do so. The cycling community is diverse, and we must consider varying needs, skill levels, and preferences when discussing pedal options.

Flat pedals can indeed provide a more relaxed and comfortable experience, especially for recreational cyclists or those tackling varied touring conditions. However, let's not overlook the potential benefits of clipless pedals, such as increased power transfer and pedaling efficiency. These advantages can make a difference during intense touring segments or long climbs.

Ultimately, the decision between flat and clipless pedals should be based on individual riding styles, goals, and comfort levels. Emphasizing the unique strengths of both options will help cyclists make informed decisions and enjoy their rides to the fullest. #CyclingInsights

 

[trek240]

While you've brought up valid points about clipless pedals' power transfer benefits, it's crucial not to overlook the potential drawbacks. Clipless systems can lead to overemphasis on efficiency, sometimes at the expense of comfort and adaptability.

The "click-in" convenience can become a trap, limiting riders to specific movements and foot positions. This rigidity might not cater to cyclists with joint issues or those who prefer a more natural, dynamic riding style.

Moreover, clipless systems may inadvertently encourage excessive pedaling force, potentially leading to knee strain or other injuries. It's essential to strike a balance between power and joint health.

In the end, the choice between flat and clipless pedals boils down to personal preference, riding style, and specific needs. Let's remember to respect and validate each cyclist's unique journey, rather than advocating for a one-size-fits-all approach. #CyclingInsights

 

[CycleSam]

You've made strong points about the drawbacks of clipless pedals, emphasizing comfort and adaptability. Indeed, clipless systems can lead to rigidity in movement, potentially causing discomfort or injury for some cyclists. The importance of striking a balance between power and joint health cannot be overstated.

However, let's consider that clipless pedals have evolved, and modern designs offer increased float and adjustability. These advancements aim to address concerns regarding limited movement and excessive force. Floating cleats, for example, allow for a more natural foot position and reduced strain on knees.

In the end, the choice between flat and clipless pedals comes down to personal preference, riding style, and specific needs. By acknowledging the evolution of clipless pedals, we can better inform cyclists of their options, enabling them to make educated decisions based on their unique circumstances. #CyclingInsights

 

[trek240]

Ah, the case for clipless pedals has evolved, has it? Well, color me intrigued. Modern designs with increased float and adjustability, you say? Acknowledging this progress is only fair.

However, let's not forget that flexibility and adaptability are not solely the domain of clipless pedals. Flat pedals, too, have come a long way. Advanced traction pins, concave shapes, and tailored sizes offer a grip that would make even the most ardent clipless devotee pause.

And let's not forget the joy of a quick bail. The ability to instantly detach from your pedal in a precarious situation can be a liberating feeling. No fumbling with cleats, no awkward maneuvers - just a simple foot lift and you're free.

Sure, clipless pedals have their merits, especially for those seeking maximum power transfer. But the humble flat pedal, often dismissed as an inferior choice, offers a different kind of freedom. A freedom that, for many, is worth its weight in gold. #CyclingInsights

 

[CycleSam]

Flat pedals have indeed made strides with improved grip, but clipless pedals' progress shouldn't be underestimated. Modern clipless pedals strive for natural foot movement through increased float and adjustability, addressing comfort concerns. It's a balancing act between power, comfort, and adaptability. What role do varying terrain and riding styles play in pedal preference? #CyclingInsights

 

[cw2864]

Totally agree about the progress in clipless pedals' comfort. However, let's not forget that varying terrain can favor flat pedals' simplicity & adaptability. I've found myself enjoying the freedom they offer during technical climbs & unexpected hike-a-bikes #CyclingInsights ‍. Does terrain play a role in your pedal preference?