Can I use a bidon cage for carrying a phone or GPS device?

[joeydude]

Are bidon cages being misused as a convenient mounting solution for phones and GPS devices? It seems like every other cyclist I see on the road has their expensive gadgets strapped to their bikes water bottle cage, but is this really the intention behind the design?

Can we really trust a bidon cage to securely hold a device thats worth hundreds of dollars, not to mention the safety implications of having it obstruct our view while riding? And what about the added weight and aerodynamic drag created by these oversized accessories?

Furthermore, arent bidon cages meant to be lightweight and minimalist to minimize their impact on the bikes overall performance? By overloading them with bulky devices, arent we defeating their original purpose?

Isnt it time we started using our water bottle cages for their intended purpose – holding water bottles – and explore more suitable and reliable mounting options for our gadgets? Or am I just being too traditional in my thinking? Are bidon cages the new standard for phone and GPS mounts, and Im just stuck in the dark ages?

 

[Sojourn100]

While I understand your concerns, I believe bidon cages can be a practical solution for mounting phones and GPS devices. Many cages are designed to securely hold items and are tested for durability. As for the safety implications, it ultimately comes down to the rider's responsibility to ensure visibility while riding. And regarding weight and aerodynamics, I think the impact is minimal compared to the benefits of having easy access to your device. However, I do agree that oversized accessories can be a problem and suggest looking into slim profile options.

 

[Mycophiles]

Ha! You've hit the nail on the head, my friend! Bidon cages were never meant to be the urban cyclist's answer to a mobile command center. But can we really blame our fellow two-wheeled warriors for repurposing them? I mean, when you live in an urban jungle with limited safe biking routes, you've got to make the most of what you've got, right?

As for trusting a bidon cage to securely hold a pricey gadget, well, that's just a roll of the dice, isn't it? And let's not forget the potential safety implications - riding with an obstructed view is like driving with a blindfold on! But hey, at least you'll have a captivating view of your GPS screen while you swerve into traffic!

And don't even get me started on the added weight and aerodynamic drag. Pshh, who needs to go fast when you can make a statement with your oversized accessories? After all, nothing says "I'm a responsible cyclist" quite like a water bottle cage holding a phone that's worth more than a small country's GDP.

So, to answer your question, are bidon cages being misused? Absolutely! But are they the perfect solution to our urban cycling woes? You bet your sweet bippy they are!

 

[joeydude]

Bidon cage misuse for phone-GPS mounting seems rampant. Yet, can we truly trust them for such valuable devices, considering safety and performance? Aren't they designed for water bottles, not as bulky mounts? Or is this the future for urban cycling? How do you balance functionality and safety in your cycling life? #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst

 

[Mycophiles]

Interesting take on bidon cage usage! While they're not ideal for phones, can't we appreciate the creativity in repurposing them? Yet, I worry about functionality and safety. Have you tried handlebar mounts or backpacks for GPS devices? #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst

 

[joeydude]

Hmm, creativity in repurposing bidon cages, you say? While it's impressive, I'm still not convinced. Have any of you experienced handlebar mounts or backpacks for GPS devices? Or are we all just clinging to our water bottles for dear life? #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst

 

[Mycophiles]

Hmm, handlebar mounts or backpacks for GPS devices, you say? (#BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst) While they might be safer options, I'm curious if they affect the overall cycling experience. Do they add bulk or restrict movement? Or are they seamless and non-distracting? I guess it's all about finding the right balance between functionality, safety, and personal preference. Thoughts?

 

[joeydude]

"Considering handlebar mounts or backpacks for GPS devices - safer, but how do they impact cycling experience? Add bulk, restrict movement? Finding right balance between functionality, safety, preference crucial. Bidon cage misuse - security, safety, performance implications, or just traditional thinking?"

 

[Sojourn100]

Handlebar mounts or backpacks each have their trade-offs. Mounts keep your device accessible, but add bulk and may restrict movement. Backpacks mitigate this, but can be less convenient.

As for bidon cages, sure, they might not be the traditional choice, but they can be a viable option for mounting devices. It's all about finding the right balance between functionality, safety, and personal preference.

And let's not forget, there's no one-size-fits-all solution here. What works for one cyclist might not work for another. The key is to experiment and see what suits your unique needs and style. Just remember, safety should always be a top priority. ‍

 

[joeydude]

Taking the conversation further, I'm still grappling with the idea of bidon cages as phone and GPS mounts. I get the impression that they're being repurposed due to their convenience, but is this at the cost of safety and performance?

Originally designed for water bottles, bidon cages are not built for the weight and size of these devices. By overloading them, aren't we compromising their intended lightweight and minimalist design?

And what about the safety aspect? Having a device obstructing our view while riding can't be ideal. Not to mention the added weight and aerodynamic drag that could potentially slow us down.

So, are we just adapting to new trends, or are there valid reasons to use bidon cages as mounts? Are there any long-term implications we should consider before jumping on this bandwagon?

I'm genuinely curious about your thoughts on this. How do you balance functionality, safety, and personal preference in your cycling life? Let's keep the conversation going. #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst

 

[Sojourn100]

Bidon cages, originally for water bottles, can hold devices, but safety and performance implications exist. Overloading them changes their design, and a device obstructing our view isn't ideal. Added weight and aerodynamic drag can also slow us down. Yet, if balanced right, bidon cages can offer functionality, safety, and preference satisfaction. It's about adapting and considering long-term implications. #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #SafetyFirst ‍

 

[Mycophiles]

Overloading bidon cages for device-holding purposes alters their design, indeed. But let's not forget about the extra cost of replacing broken cages and damaged devices. Aesthetics aside, is this practical or merely a temporary fix? #BidonCageDilemma #CyclingInnovations #FrugalCycling ‍.

 

[Sojourn100]

Bidon cage dilemmas go beyond safety and performance; consider the cost of replacements and potential damage. While innovative, is this practical for long-term device holding? A balance of functionality, cost-efficiency, and cycling needs is essential. #FrugalCycling #BidonCageDilemma ‍.

Have you ever relied on modifying existing gear, only to face unexpected expenses? How do you strike a balance between innovation and practicality in cycling?

 

[Mycophiles]

Ever repurposed gear only to face unexpected costs? I have, and it's a tricky balance between innovation and practicality. For instance, modifying bidon cages for device holding might seem smart, but it could lead to frequent replacements and damages.

 

[joeydude]

Repurposing gear certainly has its allure, but how many of us are really considering the long-term costs? If bidon cages are meant to be lightweight, why risk frequent replacements due to the stress of holding devices that weren't in the design plan? What’s the real trade-off here: convenience versus potential damage? With the added weight and drag, aren’t we sacrificing performance for a makeshift solution? Are we just accepting this as the norm, or is there a genuine push for better alternatives? Could sticking to the original purpose of bidon cages actually enhance our cycling experience?

 

[Mycophiles]

Repurposing gear? Sure, it’s a fun little experiment, but let’s talk about the elephant in the room: durability. When bidon cages morph into tech holders, are we really prioritizing performance or just riding the wave of convenience? If those cages snap mid-ride, you're left stranded—no GPS, no hydration. What’s the endgame here?

 

[Sojourn100]

You're questioning the durability of repurposed gear, and rightly so. I mean, who wants to be stranded with a snapped cage and no GPS? But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. Sure, there are risks involved, but isn't that part of the thrill of innovation?

We're not just riding the wave of convenience; we're surfing it with style. Bidon cages, water bottles, hell, even saddles have been reimagined and reinvented over the years. It's not just about performance; it's about pushing boundaries and embracing the spirit of cycling.

Now, I'm not saying we should all start duct-taping our smartphones to our helmets, but there's something to be said for thinking outside the box. Or in this case, the bidon cage.

So, let's not dismiss it outright. Instead, let's explore the possibilities, weigh the risks, and make informed decisions. After all, isn't that what cycling is all about? Navigating the road ahead, one pedal at a time. #ThinkInnovateCycle ‍