A quick question: Other than aesthetics, are there any significant differences, in performance or durability, between Campy Veloce and Centaur triple cranks? Or more narrowly: Are there any functional differences between the stamped alu chainrings that come stock with Veloce cranks and the machined ones that come with Centaur?
believe it or not, stamped components /can/ have better mechanical properties than machined, but accuracy is generally not as good.
you're not going to go far wrong either way. if you want to save a few bucks, get the veloce crank but the centaur b/b.
jb
trent gregory hill said:
A quick question: Other than aesthetics, are there any significant differences, in performance or durability, between Campy Veloce and Centaur triple cranks? Or more narrowly: Are there any functional differences between the stamped alu chainrings that come stock with Veloce cranks and the machined ones that come with Centaur?
A quick question: Other than aesthetics, are there any significant differences, in performance or durability, between Campy Veloce and Centaur triple cranks?
I looked into this when choosing my triple chainset, and besides finish, I haven't found any evidence or opinions that there is any difference at all between Mirage, Veloce and Centaur crank arms.
Quoted message said:
Or more narrowly: Are there any functional differences between the stamped alu chainrings that come stock with Veloce cranks and the machined ones that come with Centaur?
Centaur rings are said to last longer but Veloce rings work and last very well in my experience. Certainly do /look/ a bit cheap though.