Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Campy triple

Started by Brian S · · Last activity · 4 posts · 715 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
31 January 2004
Last activity
1 February 2004
Original author
Brian S
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
715
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I will be riding in the mountains this summer and want to install a triple crankset. What are the
    differences between the 2003 Record (alloy) triple and the 2004 Chorus triple? Since the price
    differential is only $10, cost is not a concern. Are the specs and materials of construction the
    same? Is there any reason to prefer one over the other (beside the $10)? Snob appeal is not a
    concern. I need a new FD and that will be Record (gift from my brother). My RD will remain my 2003
    Chorus. Any advice will be appreciated.

  2. Brian S said:

    I will be riding in the mountains this summer and want to install a triple crankset. What are
    the differences between the 2003 Record (alloy) triple and the 2004 Chorus triple? Since the
    price differential is only $10, cost is not a concern. Are the specs and materials of
    construction the same?

    According to the Campagnolo website, Record triple crank has aluminium chainrings bolts and nuts
    while Chorus does not. This would also explain why the Record crankset is 15 g lighter. Considering
    the similar prices, I doubt there's any other real difference.

    -as

  3. Brian S said:

    I will be riding in the mountains this summer and want to install a triple crankset. What are the
    differences between the 2003 Record (alloy) triple and the 2004 Chorus triple? Since the price
    differential is only $10, cost is not a concern. Are the specs and materials of construction the
    same? Is there any reason to prefer one over the other (beside the $10)? Snob appeal is not a
    concern. I need a new FD and that will be Record (gift from my brother). My RD will remain my 2003
    Chorus. Any advice will be appreciated.

    I went from a Record double crank to a Centaur triple crank. The rings are identical and believe it
    or not the Centaur is a little bit lighter(745 vs.735g). You can't tell it's a Centaur crank until
    you get close enough to read the label on the crank arms. The metal cranks of Record, Chorus and
    Centaur are virtually the same. I never did like the crank arm bolt located on the Record crank arm
    also, for me, the chainring bolts of Record would too easily snap off or split at the head (too lazy
    to use a torque wrench). When converting to triple I also changed the BB to a 111mm Phil Wood and
    the FD to a Record triple. Save yourself the $100+ by going Centaur and use the money saved to buy
    the Campy Veloce 10 spd cassette. I'm very satisfied with my current triple setup.

    Kenny Lee

  4. dbsams-<< I will be riding in the mountains this summer and want to install a triple crankset. What
    are the differences between the 2003 Record (alloy) triple and the 2004 Chorus triple? >><BR><BR>

    The label on the crank arms...

    << Are the specs and materials of construction the same? >><BR><BR>

    yessir-

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.