Is there a big difference in Q-factor between Centaur and Record triple cranks? I've measured the
difference between a Centaur triple (with 111mm BB) and Record double (with 102mm BB). The
difference turned out to be 2.3cm difference (16.9 - 14.6) which is really noticable while
riding. Anybody knows how a Record triple crankset with Record or Chorus 111mm BB relates to one
or both of these?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Campy Q-factors
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 13 May 2003
- Last activity
- 14 May 2003
- Original author
- Ronald
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 904
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
IDK, but modern triples are splayed too wide so they clear everything. I have older suginos that are
better also TA makes narrower triples -
<< Anybody knows how a Record triple crankset with Record or Chorus 111mm BB relates to one or
both of these?All Campagnolo triple cranks are the same q factor if using the 111mm , proper BB, 65.5mm center of
BB shell to inside of crank arm, symmetyrical, From 2002/3 tech specs.Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.comOpen ↗ "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.