General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Cameras in rucksacks

Started by The Reids · · Last activity · 4 posts · 277 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 June 2005
Last activity
3 June 2005
Original author
The Reids
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
277
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My old manual film camera and 17, 24-70, 70-210mm all fitted in a
    small two lens either side of lens/body camera bag packed like
    this :- iTi
    My new digital autofocus 12-24, 24-70, 70-300 only fit in that
    type of bag of a size that wont easily go into a daypack. F2.8
    lenses do have drawbacks!

    What do people do? Lenses in seperate cases and camera in a
    holster type bag on waist belt?
    --
    Mike Reid
    Wasdale-Thames path-London-Photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap

  2. I used to lug a film SLR with separate lenses (over 3kg) but found that it
    was incompatible with a manageable plan for mountain photography and I took
    few good pictures. New technology brings new possible tradeoffs and the
    high quality compact seems much more appropriate. Mine weighs under 700gms
    and does around 28 equiv to 200 optical. For wideangle (or at least
    panorama) the excellent stitching software it comes with is just about good
    enough for most purposes. By keeping it in a small external case it's
    possible to deploy the camera and take opportunistic pictures in seconds and
    not be impeded by weight in doing long distance walking. It has enough
    controls and can use filters enabling good use of more leisurely situations.
    Overall I find I can make far more use of the opportunities presented on a
    given walk so I effectively end up with a more useable tool.

    Incidentally I came across the following on-line book on photography
    recently http://www.silversilicon.com/PATH/book_frame_1.htm - a really
    refreshing antidote to much that's written on photography.

    Simon Stewart
    www.mountainviews.ie

  3. In message <[email hidden]>, The Reids
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    What do people do? Lenses in seperate cases and camera in a
    holster type bag on waist belt?

    I recently bought a Lowepro Orion Trekker rucksac to carry my SLR gear
    in. It's about 40 quid in Jessops. The cameras etc fit in the separately
    zipped bottom section, and there's a small but sufficient space in the
    top part for waterproof, maps and the like.

    Personally when hillwalking I usually leave the SLR gear at home and use
    a point and squirt camera carried in a bag on my waistbelt.

    Regards

    --
    Neil Pugh

  4. Now I've gone digital I am still amazed by the quality of the zooms. When
    I'm backbacking I now just take the SLR and a 17 - 70 zoom (about 28 to 105)
    and make do with that. I think I may add an ultra wide zoom, but then
    there's weight to think about.

    I use a Lowepro case which I carry across my body, bandolier style

    --
    Andy Howell
    Birmingham, UK

    To mail simply put back the dots ...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.