The sweat mechanism is designed to cool the body like a radiator cools the body.
This is not quite right. Unlike an automobile radiator, which is a simple heat exchanger, the sweat mechanism relies primarily on water's 540-calorie-per-gram latent heat of vaporization. Were it not for the cooling caused by evaporation, we could not cool ourselves when the ambient temperature was greater than body temperature.
ex. Typically I might do 1000kJ/hr accorinding to my trainer. If efficiency is 25%, and there are about 4 kJ in 1 cal. I'm burning 1000 cal/hr.
I could see a rower buring about the same number of calories in an hour, but not say two times more, which is why I think the figure above is the approx. total energy used.
-Amit
This would seem to fit: 1:57 for an hour is about 1150 calories according to a Concept 2.
Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"
Quoted message said:
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... > In article
<[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> "Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote: > > > > > From heart rate there must be an estimate of power output from a user > > programmed set-up value. From that an integration of varying heartrate (power output) together > > with say a 25% efficiency, will come up with an estimate of
calories
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> > burned. Likely not very accurate, IMO +/- 10%. > > > > > You mean when the rowing machine says I burned 831 calories, it
might
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> not be exactly that many? > > --Harold Buck
What do you think Harold? Does the machine know your efficiency or
your
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
reciprocating mass?
It had better after making me program that info into it.
--Harold Buck
So what is your efficiency and how did you measure it?
I measured how much work I did and how many calories I burned doing that work, and I divided. Simple.
-Harold
--Harold Buck
"I used to rock and roll all night, and party every day. Then it was every other day. . . ."
Ah well, it only ever did work well in one direction. No nagging mechanism to stop you eating too much as there is for eating too little. Could you find one person - apart from perhaps Callista Flockhard (sp?) - where this doesn't work.
My hungry/full indicators aren't very accurate, so I have to eat before I'm hungry and keep eating after I'm full. It must be genetic, since siblings have the same "problem". -- terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combikeOpen ↗
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"
Quoted message said:
Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article
<[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > "]news:[email hidden]... > > In article
<[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
> > "Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote: > > > > > > > > From heart rate there must be an estimate of power output
from a
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> user > > > programmed set-up value. From that an integration of varying heartrate (power output) > together > > > with say a 25% efficiency, will come up with an estimate of
calories
Quoted message said:
> > > burned. Likely not very accurate, IMO +/- 10%. > > > > > > > > > You mean when the rowing machine says I burned 831 calories,
it
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
might
Quoted message said:
> > not be exactly that many? > > > > --Harold Buck > > What do you think Harold? Does the machine know your efficiency
or
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
your
Quoted message said:
> reciprocating mass?
It had better after making me program that info into it.
--Harold Buck
So what is your efficiency and how did you measure it?
I measured how much work I did and how many calories I burned doing
that
Quoted message said:
work, and I divided. Simple.
And that completes the circle. Way to go Harold :-)
"Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
W K said:
Ah well, it only ever did work well in one direction. No nagging
mechanism
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
to stop you eating too much as there is for eating too little. Could you find one person - apart from perhaps Callista Flockhard
(sp?) -
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
where this doesn't work.
My hungry/full indicators aren't very accurate, so I have to eat before I'm hungry and keep eating after I'm full. It must be genetic, since siblings have the same "problem".
My hungry/full indicators aren't very accurate, so I have to eat before I'm hungry and keep eating after I'm full. It must be genetic, since siblings have the same "problem".
Are you really thin then?
5' 11", 135 lbs. Most people would consider that thin. It certainly makes climbing easier.
"Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Ernie Trish said:
I have a calorie burn question.
I've been using a Polar 720 heart monitor, which produces a calorie estimate for each workout. I find it handy, since it gives me an idea of how much to eat that day.
Most people have bodies equipped with hunger mechanisms that calculate how much exercise you've done, how many calories are in your food, allowing your body weight to stay pretty much the same no matter what you do.
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that will tell them when their heart rate is to high, yet we still find that we need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
Quoted message said:
If I do say 2 hours my body has done the calculations and cries out until for more until I have taken in the appropriate amount of calories.
"Øyvind Røtvold" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
W K said:
"Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Ernie Trish wrote:
> I have a calorie burn question.
I've been using a Polar 720 heart monitor, which produces a calorie estimate for each workout. I find it handy, since it gives me an idea
of
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
how much to eat that day.
Most people have bodies equipped with hunger mechanisms that calculate
how
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
much exercise you've done, how many calories are in your food, allowing
your
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
body weight to stay pretty much the same no matter what you do.
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that will tell them when their heart rate is to high, yet we still find that we need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
"These mechanisms" actually work better than heart rate monitors (read the abstracts for the upcoming American College of Sports Medicine meeting).
"Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Ernie Trish wrote:
> I have a calorie burn question.
I've been using a Polar 720 heart monitor, which produces a calorie estimate for each workout. I find it handy, since it gives me an idea of how much to eat that day.
Most people have bodies equipped with hunger mechanisms that calculate how much exercise you've done, how many calories are in your food, allowing your body weight to stay pretty much the same no matter what you do.
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that will tell them when their heart rate is too high, yet we still find that we need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
Who is this "we" that "need heart rate monitors"? Having used them for a couple of decades or so with athletes of various standards, I find them a distraction and relatively useless as a coaching tool...
I found that I can guess my LT a whole lot more accurately than I can lower levels. Heart rate monitors aren't necessary for those hard days though it can give information on whether you are beginning to overtrain. They are most useful in showing you that you are working to hard on your easy days.
"Andy Coggan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Øyvind Røtvold" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
W K said:
"Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... > Ernie Trish wrote: > > > I have a calorie burn question. > > I've been using a Polar 720 heart monitor, which produces a
calorie
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> estimate for each workout. I find it handy, since it gives me
an idea
Quoted message said:
of
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> how much to eat that day.
Most people have bodies equipped with hunger mechanisms that
calculate
Quoted message said:
how
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
much exercise you've done, how many calories are in your food,
allowing
Quoted message said:
your
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
body weight to stay pretty much the same no matter what you do.
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that
will
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
tell them when their heart rate is to high, yet we still find that
we
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
"These mechanisms" actually work better than heart rate monitors
(read the
Quoted message said:
abstracts for the upcoming American College of Sports Medicine
"Allan Bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Who is this "we" that "need heart rate monitors"? Having used them
for a
Quoted message said:
couple of decades or so with athletes of various standards, I find
them a
Quoted message said:
distraction and relatively useless as a coaching tool...
I agree with this on the proviso that they are necessary to develop the "feel" for the right training levels. After you know how to train you don't need heart rate monitors and you should also drop bike computers as well. That is also a distraction that leads to you trying to go too hard on easy days.
"Øyvind Røtvold" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that will tell them when their heart rate is to high, yet we still find that we need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
"These mechanisms" actually work better than heart rate monitors (read the abstracts for the upcoming American College of Sports Medicine meeting).
Andy Coggan
During a very difficult interval session last Wednesday, I felt a new pressure/pain in my chest. It went away after I immediately backed off on the effort.
Is this the kind of mechanism you have in mind or was there another that I should have listened to first? (I apologize if this is over the line of asking for medical advice on the net.)
-- -- Lynn Wallace xmission.com~lawallOpen ↗ "Let me tell you what else I'm worried about. I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for the military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place." George Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
"Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Andy Coggan said:
"Øyvind Røtvold" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Most people also have bodies equipped with fatigue mecanisms that will tell them when their heart rate is to high, yet we still find that we need heart rate monitors; these mechanisms simply don't work to perfection..
"These mechanisms" actually work better than heart rate monitors (read
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
abstracts for the upcoming American College of Sports Medicine meeting).
Andy Coggan
During a very difficult interval session last Wednesday, I felt a new pressure/pain in my chest. It went away after I immediately backed off on the effort.
Is this the kind of mechanism you have in mind or was there another that I should have listened to first? (I apologize if this is over the line of asking for medical advice on the net.)
Not the kind of mechanism I had in mind, and definitely not normal - you should follow up with a cardiologist.
"Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Andy Coggan said:
"These mechanisms" actually work better than heart rate monitors (read
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
abstracts for the upcoming American College of Sports Medicine meeting).
Andy Coggan
During a very difficult interval session last Wednesday, I felt a new pressure/pain in my chest. It went away after I immediately backed off on the effort.
Is this the kind of mechanism you have in mind or was there another that I should have listened to first? (I apologize if this is over the line of asking for medical advice on the net.)
Not the kind of mechanism I had in mind, and definitely not normal - you should follow up with a cardiologist.
Andy Coggan
If I had insurance, I would. As it is, a web search indicates that the pain I felt was not all that unusual. I believe (hope) that I did nothing more than temporarily fail to meet my heart's oxygen needs. It was a REAL hard session, and I was pushing my hardest at the time.
-- -- Lynn Wallace xmission.com~lawallOpen ↗ "Let me tell you what else I'm worried about. I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for the military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place." George Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
If I had insurance, I would. As it is, a web search indicates that the pain I felt was not all that unusual. I believe (hope) that I did nothing more than temporarily fail to meet my heart's oxygen needs. It was a REAL hard session, and I was pushing my hardest at the time.
Probably worth at least getting the old cholesterol checked. It *might* make you reasses what you can / can't afford 🙂
Alex.
-- Reply to:[email hidden] cutting out the usual...
If I had insurance, I would. As it is, a web search indicates that the pain I felt was not all that unusual. I believe (hope) that I did nothing more than temporarily fail to meet my heart's oxygen needs. It was a REAL hard session, and I was pushing my hardest at the time.
Mark Twain said, "Be careful about reading health books. You could die of a misprint."
The same goes a hundredfold for the internet.
--Harold Buck
"I used to rock and roll all night, and party every day. Then it was every other day. . . ."
If I had insurance, I would. As it is, a web search indicates that the pain I felt was not all that unusual. I believe (hope) that I did nothing more than temporarily fail to meet my heart's oxygen needs. It was a REAL hard session, and I was pushing my hardest at the time.
Probably worth at least getting the old cholesterol checked. It *might* make you reasses what you can / can't afford 🙂
Alex.
Last I checked, a few years ago, it was just shy of "high." If I drop off the net completely in the near future, at least you all know why now. :-)
I feel pretty safe. I don't know if I've EVER worked my body/heart as hard as I did last week when this happened. I don't need to be pushing my max that much, having achieved an acceptable level of fitness.
But perhaps I'll go to the local sports science academy and have a maximal heart rate test done. That's pretty cheap.
-- -- Lynn Wallace xmission.com~lawallOpen ↗ "Let me tell you what else I'm worried about. I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for the military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place." George Bush, Nov. 6, 2000