Road Cycling · Public discussion

But did you spot THIS Breaking Away "blooper?"

Started by Paul Kossa · · Last activity · 2 posts · 688 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 March 2004
Last activity
8 March 2004
Original author
Paul Kossa
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
688
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. No, I'm not refering to going 50 mph in the small chainring
    . . . many people know about that. (That may be attributed
    to a film editor with little cycling knowledge.) I found an
    "error" -- which I suspect is actually an "insider joke' of
    sorts rather than a blooper, per se -- that I doubt many
    know of since it lasts all of 2 or 3 FRAMES, and you'll need
    to pause the tape or DVD at just the right instant to see
    it. (Iapologize if this was mentioned in that HUGE 25th
    aniversery thread, but I don't have time to go
    through stuff that long!)

    The scene is when David gets the mail, when he finds out the
    Italians are coming. If you pause just as he starts to open
    the magazine, you'll see it is a "Sports Illustrated." Based
    on the photo on the cover and the headlines, including
    "Challenging the Clock: A Report on Time Trialing," and
    "Clothes for Cycling," as well as the few pages visible
    while he flips through it, it appears to be an all-cycling
    issue . . . a huge "blooper" in and of itself! But the
    kicker is the other headline: "Eddy Merckx Rebounds In '78!"
    [At least that's what it looks like on my not-so-high-
    resolution VHS tape.] (According to an old Velonews article,
    Merckx only rode 5 races that year and didn't win any.) I
    know the film was released in '79, so I guess it was filmed
    in '78. And I thought I read it was filmed in Aug., before
    classes started, so I would think they already knew of
    Merckx status. Therefore the "insider joke" theory. Anyone
    know more on that?

  2. "Paul Kossa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, I'm not refering to going 50 mph in the small
    chainring . . . many people know about that. (That may be
    attributed to a film editor with little cycling
    knowledge.) I found an "error" -- which I suspect is
    actually an "insider joke' of sorts rather than a blooper,
    per se -- that I doubt many know of since it lasts all of
    2 or 3 FRAMES, and you'll need to pause the tape or DVD at
    just the right instant to see
    it. (Iapologize if this was mentioned in that HUGE 25th
    aniversery thread, but I don't have time to go
    through stuff that long!)

    The scene is when David gets the mail, when he finds out
    the Italians are coming. If you pause just as he starts to
    open the magazine, you'll see it is a "Sports
    Illustrated." Based on the photo on the cover and the
    headlines, including "Challenging the Clock: A Report on
    Time Trialing," and "Clothes for Cycling," as well as the
    few pages visible while he flips through it, it appears to
    be an all-cycling issue . . . a huge "blooper" in and of
    itself! But the kicker is the other headline: "Eddy Merckx
    Rebounds In '78!" [At least that's what it looks like on
    my not-so-high-resolution VHS tape.] (According to an old
    Velonews article, Merckx only rode 5 races that year and
    didn't win any.) I know the film was released in '79, so I
    guess it was filmed in '78. And I thought I read it was
    filmed in Aug., before classes started, so I would think
    they already knew of Merckx status. Therefore the "insider
    joke" theory. Anyone know more on that?

    I can tell you that it WASN'T filmed in August. Classes were
    in session during the filming. Those are real students all
    over the campus and in the cafeteria and in the stands at
    the Little 500. I was one of 'em!

    Bob C. (dating myself ... wait, that sounds really weird)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.