CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
I have been running in 2002 (?? grey with blue) Brooks Beasts for a
few years and found them to be great. I am a clydesdale, varying from
230-250 and have run a half marathon every spring, doing about 15-30
miles/week for training. I just bought a 2006 pair of Beasts and
noticed the toe box is very tight compared to my previous pair (same
size and width). Has anyone else noticed this? Has Brooks redesigned
the functionality of the shoe?
Cheers
Quoted message said:I have been running in 2002 (?? grey with blue) Brooks Beasts for a
few years and found them to be great. I am a clydesdale, varying from
230-250 and have run a half marathon every spring, doing about 15-30
miles/week for training. I just bought a 2006 pair of Beasts and
noticed the toe box is very tight compared to my previous pair (same
size and width). Has anyone else noticed this? Has Brooks redesigned
the functionality of the shoe?Cheers
Shoe companies run the company much like the car companies. They like
to keep a name plate that sells, but change, usually cheapen, the
product to make more money. Every shoe purchase should be considered
individually.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.