Isnt everyone building a custom gravel bike with the Boardman ADV 9.0 overlooking the elephant in the room - its relatively conservative geometry? Given that modern gravel bikes are trending towards slacker head angles, lower bottom brackets, and longer wheelbases, doesnt the ADV 9.0s more traditional design make it less than ideal for tackling technical, rocky terrain or high-speed descents?
Is the Boardman ADV 9.0s emphasis on versatility and comfort coming at the expense of true off-road capability? Does the bikes lack of adjustability in the head tube and seat tube angles limit its potential for customization, forcing builders to make compromises in either the front or rear end of the bike?
Can the ADV 9.0s fork be truly optimized for both on-road and off-road performance, given its 100mm of travel and relatively narrow clearance for larger tires? Doesnt this compromise limit the bikes ability to tackle more aggressive terrain, or require builders to make difficult choices between tire size and suspension performance?
Furthermore, isnt the trend towards building custom gravel bikes with high-end components, paired with the ADV 9.0s more affordable price point, creating a false narrative around the bikes capabilities and limitations? Are builders setting themselves up for disappointment by expecting the ADV 9.0 to perform on par with more expensive, purpose-built gravel bikes?
Isnt it time to reevaluate the Boardman ADV 9.0s place in the world of gravel bikes, and consider whether its strengths and weaknesses make it better suited to a different type of rider or terrain?
Is the Boardman ADV 9.0s emphasis on versatility and comfort coming at the expense of true off-road capability? Does the bikes lack of adjustability in the head tube and seat tube angles limit its potential for customization, forcing builders to make compromises in either the front or rear end of the bike?
Can the ADV 9.0s fork be truly optimized for both on-road and off-road performance, given its 100mm of travel and relatively narrow clearance for larger tires? Doesnt this compromise limit the bikes ability to tackle more aggressive terrain, or require builders to make difficult choices between tire size and suspension performance?
Furthermore, isnt the trend towards building custom gravel bikes with high-end components, paired with the ADV 9.0s more affordable price point, creating a false narrative around the bikes capabilities and limitations? Are builders setting themselves up for disappointment by expecting the ADV 9.0 to perform on par with more expensive, purpose-built gravel bikes?
Isnt it time to reevaluate the Boardman ADV 9.0s place in the world of gravel bikes, and consider whether its strengths and weaknesses make it better suited to a different type of rider or terrain?