Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

BNE: Infrastructure planning

Started by Duracell Bunny · · Last activity · 3 posts · 532 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
5 October 2006
Last activity
5 October 2006
Original author
Duracell Bunny
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
532
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From the Brisbane Institute web site:
    http://www.brisinst.org.au/resources/nightingale_john_activetransport.html

    while much is being done in and around Brisbane to improve accessibility via the
    car and public transport, John Nightingale asks what has happened to plans to
    provide better infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists.

    Amongst the many infrastructure projects that are being rushed into existence in
    South East Queensland are a number that converge on that small area between the
    Brisbane River at Dutton Park Cemetery and the South East Freeway. These include
    the North South Bypass Tunnel, the Green Bridge, the Boggo Road Busway, Stages 1
    and 2, and the Boggo Road Urban Village. The goal of all these projects is the
    improvement of urban amenity and the development of transport oriented centres
    to reduce congestion strains on the current road system, as well as greenhouse
    gas emissions.

    The Tunnel is supposed to reduce congestion on surface roads between
    Wooloongabba and Bowen Hills. The Green Bridge should reduce the burden of
    university bound traffic on the Riverside Expressway, Coronation Drive and Sir
    Fred Schonell Drive. The Boggo Road Busway should improve access to the Green
    Bridge, reducing pressure on Cornwall Street and Annerley Road, and raise
    patronage on routes to the university with reduced travel times, thereby
    increasing alternative traffic usage. Stage 1 of the Boggo Road Busway will
    allow bus access from the South East Busway at O'Keefe Street to Annerley Road,
    with stations at PA Hospital and Park Road Railway Station. Stage 2 will remove
    buses from Annerley Road, allowing bus-only routes to connect to the Green
    Bridge. Boggo Road Urban Village will provide jobs and upmarket flats for
    hundreds of new workers and residents, convenient to bus and train services.

    But what is being done for those who do not need either bus or train to complete
    their journeys to and from the University, PA Hospital, the Urban Village and
    destinations north, east, west and south of this area? The Green Bridge has
    dedicated pedestrian and cycle paths, one on each side of the busway, designed
    to attract pedestrians and cyclists and reduce pressure on motorised traffic on
    arterial and local roads both on the Dutton Park side of the river and in St
    Lucia. But the great divide created by Queensland Rail's land and rail lines
    ensures that without the creation of dedicated routes pedestrians and cyclists
    will have to go right around this divide, via the Annerley Road bridge over the
    railway to the south, or via a messy route through industrial and residential
    streets to the north of the railway as it goes from Park Road Station to Buranda
    Station.

    The cyclist approaching this precinct from the east will have to make some
    choices as O'Keefe Street runs from under the Freeway to Ipswich Road. North or
    south? Which hills? Which busy or narrow streets? The pedestrian wishing to get
    from west of the railway easement to Buranda shopping centre or PA Hospital will
    similarly have to take a long walk around, one way or the other. The Urban
    Village, with all its new workers and residents, will find itself cut off from
    the bulk of services offered by Buranda and Stones Corner, and will be confined
    to Annerley Road as access to nearby shopping.

    Now, long after the Busway plan has been made, tenders let and work begun, a
    small team from Queensland Transport has been assembled to deal with pedestrian
    and cycle access. Strange, indeed, that two busway stations, one linked to Park
    Road Railway Station, have been planned without much thought to how patrons
    might make their way from these stations to anywhere but their most immediate
    environment. Only now that those plans are virtually set in concrete is some
    consideration being given. And how is this consideration being given: a
    committee of remote senior public servants has been formed to act for
    stakeholders. There are representatives of Queensland Transport, the Department
    of Main Roads, Queensland Health and PA Hospital, Education Queensland
    (supposedly representing the interests of the Dutton Park State School
    community), Queensland Rail, the Department of Public Works, a couple of
    consultants and the Brisbane City Council. The one non-bureaucrat (or their
    consultants) to be invited was the Manager of the Queensland peak body which
    represents the State's (non-sporting) cyclists, Bicycle Queensland, to
    articulate the needs of local cyclists. No one represented pedestrians or the
    local community; no one represented local business people from Buranda or
    Annerley Road shops and offices, no university students or staff. In other
    words, the planning was being done from the top down by 'stakeholders' whose
    interest in the project was bureaucratic rather than from their involvement in
    the local community of would-be users.

    The bureaucratic structures within which this planning takes place is not
    designed for genuine integration of transport modes, nor is it designed to
    fulfil the goals for promotion of active transport in Queensland and Brisbane -
    the utterly impossible goal in the Council's 2005 Transport Plan of 15 per cent
    of all trips to be walking and 8 per cent by cycle by 2016 being one. Busway
    planners are required to focus only on the buses, and to some extent on getting
    people to the busway stations. Treasury guidelines prevent release of any funds
    allocated for Busways for 'non-Busway' related planning, construction or
    facilities, even where proposed in conjunction with a Busway. They are not to be
    allowed to plan footpaths or cycleways alongside the busway, as was originally
    planned, but never built, for the South East Busway.

    Further evidence of the reality behind the rhetoric of active transport can be
    seen in the treatment that bicycle facilities and infrastructure has been given
    even in the past year:

    1. The almost two year 'temporary' diversion on the Bicentenial Bikeway caused
    by work on Brisbane's sewers;
    2. The inordinate delay in completing the missing link of the Western Freeway
    bikeway;
    3. The almost non-existent access to the CBD from the northside, save the wide
    swing past the Victoria Park golf course and the ICB and in through the Roma
    Street Parklands (whereupon one again meets heavy traffic); and
    4. The long wait for a safe route from the city through the Normanby Fiveways.

    This is not to forget the lost opportunity of the never-to-be-built South East
    Busway cycleway, a vastly superior conception by comparison with the
    inconveniently hilly and indirect South East Freeway Bikeway, patched together
    over the past 15 years.

    When it comes to provision of facilities for cyclists and pedestrians for secure
    storage of bicycles and shower/changing after a hot walk, run or ride, neither
    private landlords, building managers nor city council ordinances give much
    support. While buildings have to provide car parks, thus intensifying the inflow
    of commuter and shopper traffic to the CBD and other important employment nodes
    close by (such as the Universities and hospitals), there is little compulsion or
    inspection to enforce what little cycle parking is imposed by regulations (which
    is the reason the facilities in the new Queens Plaza in Queen St Mall are
    carefully hidden and thus not used, and the use of the showers demanded by
    Council regulation restricted to those 'lucky' enough to have a security pass).

    Despite all the wonderful Ministerial and Lord Mayoral words over the past
    decade, no matter which Minister or Lord Mayor, regardless of party, is in
    power, nothing has really changed since Wilbur Smith's Riverside Expressway was
    built in the 1960s. The only major project by the Brisbane City Council is Trans
    Apex, throwing billions of good money after bad, yet again. The car remains
    dominant, and any public transport has to compete for custom with bikes and
    walking. But it is public transport that gets the lion's share of the money not
    allocated to cars.

    All we can conclude is that the plans and goals of government and councils are
    simply empty rhetoric - meaningless gestures toward politically correct goals,
    no more significant than the lovely photographs of families cycling in
    advertisements for master planned housing developments or the carefree shopper
    depicted in an advertisement for Queens Plaza.

    --
    Karen Gallagher

    "Reverse the polarity and invert the particle flux!"
    "You mean put the batteries in the other way?"
    "...yes."
    -Star Trek (any of them)

  2. Duracell Bunny wrote:

    [Lots of good stuff snipped...]

    Quoted message said:

    Despite all the wonderful Ministerial and Lord Mayoral words over the
    past decade, no matter which Minister or Lord Mayor, regardless of
    party, is in power, nothing has really changed since Wilbur Smith's
    Riverside Expressway was built in the 1960s. The only major project by
    the Brisbane City Council is Trans Apex, throwing billions of good money
    after bad, yet again. The car remains dominant, and any public transport
    has to compete for custom with bikes and walking. But it is public
    transport that gets the lion's share of the money not allocated to cars.

    Please allow a lurker to jump in on this point.

    The next step in the good money after bad TransApex horror show is the
    Hale Street Link. This is where it must stop.
    The huge backlash against this bridge has finally convinced the Labor
    "opposition" (who have a Council majority) to take notice and undertake
    to stop the bridge if a majority "no" submission is received to the
    Impact Assessment Statement (IAS).

    Submissions are due by Friday 13 Otober. A proforma and more
    information is available at
    http://www.stopthehalestreetbridge.org

    If anyone is interested, I can provide more information on the real
    effects the bridge is forecast to have. Oddly enough, the traffic
    forecasts in the IAS show the exact opposite of Campbell Newman's
    statements promoting the bridge.

    What Brisbane needs far more than a toll bridge for cars is more cycle
    and pedestrian river crossings. Several could be built at far less cost
    than the HSL.
    (A decent public transport system would help too.)

    If you live in Brisbane, get that submission in! Encourage everyone you
    know do so too!

    My apologies for butting in. Nice meeting you all.

    Dave

  3. Dave said:

    Duracell Bunny wrote:

    [Lots of good stuff snipped...]

    Quoted message said:

    Despite all the wonderful Ministerial and Lord Mayoral words over the
    past decade, no matter which Minister or Lord Mayor, regardless of
    party, is in power, nothing has really changed since Wilbur Smith's
    Riverside Expressway was built in the 1960s. The only major project by
    the Brisbane City Council is Trans Apex, throwing billions of good money
    after bad, yet again. The car remains dominant, and any public transport
    has to compete for custom with bikes and walking. But it is public
    transport that gets the lion's share of the money not allocated to cars.

    Please allow a lurker to jump in on this point.

    The next step in the good money after bad TransApex horror show is the
    Hale Street Link. This is where it must stop.
    The huge backlash against this bridge has finally convinced the Labor
    "opposition" (who have a Council majority) to take notice and undertake
    to stop the bridge if a majority "no" submission is received to the
    Impact Assessment Statement (IAS).

    Submissions are due by Friday 13 Otober. A proforma and more
    information is available at
    http://www.stopthehalestreetbridge.org

    If anyone is interested, I can provide more information on the real
    effects the bridge is forecast to have. Oddly enough, the traffic
    forecasts in the IAS show the exact opposite of Campbell Newman's
    statements promoting the bridge.

    What Brisbane needs far more than a toll bridge for cars is more cycle
    and pedestrian river crossings. Several could be built at far less cost
    than the HSL.
    (A decent public transport system would help too.)

    If you live in Brisbane, get that submission in! Encourage everyone you
    know do so too!

    My apologies for butting in. Nice meeting you all.

    Dave

    Good call Dave. That's the same conclusion as reached by the CBD-BUG,
    which is preparing a submission. One of the weirdest things about the
    Hale St Link is it will undermine the Eleanor Schonell (Green) Bridge
    and give drivers an easier way to get to UQ, so they won't use the bus
    over the ESB. Another aspect of the HSL project is a complete lack of
    linkage to the northside, which has woeful links into the CBD. Get
    those subs in!!

    Donga

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.