I have several bikes. My 'A' bikes are both size 63 Trek 2000's, one from
around 1999 and the other an 06. I really do love riding both of them,
despite my ineptitude at adjusting Shimano derailleurs, (only matched by my
LBS). The Treks, as most Treks tend to be, are very traditional geometry.
For a winter bike (as I have become more keen on riding recently), I thought
I would buy a Specialized Allez, sized 61, it seemed like good value and it
does look very nice indeed. Can't be that much difference I thought. I feel
every bit as comfortable on the Allez, perhaps more so, but I can't generate
ANY power or speed on the brute, it's horrific. I can get up to my
theoretical maximum HR and it still feel as if the axles tied to a heavy
weight or something.
I intend to have it's perfectly acceptable components relocated to a
'traditional' frame, but I am so stumped by this. It just shouldn't be this
bad. Every now and then I think I will try it again, it will be better this
time. But, no it isn't, it's hell itself. Any thoughts I am just amazed
there's such a big difference.