Road Cycling · Public discussion

bike accessory @ NASA

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 381 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
28 October 2007
Last activity
29 October 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
381
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. pls check and comment on the new design of bike stand

    http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=798

  2. I can just see them adding that to my 15lb bicycle... It's for motorbikes...

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    pls check and comment on the new design of bike stand

    http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=798

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:

    pls check and comment on the new design of bike stand

    http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=79
    8

    too much coffee, man.

    --
    The part of betatron @ earthlink . net was played by a garden gnome

  4. Greetings,

    Even though this is off-topic for a bicycle newsgroup, please accept the
    following constructive critism on this design (since I also ride motorcycles
    as well).

    Sorry, but the design is not satisfactory for real-world use.

    Here's why...

    First, the spread of the verticle supports is too narrow - they need to be
    about 30 degrees from perpendicular to the ground on each side of the bike.
    The simplistic design of the mechanical leveling switch as well as delays in
    motion and movement of the supports and the bike) would cause
    overcompensation when leveling the bike. The narrower the spread of the
    supports, the greater potential for overcompensation.

    Second, the mechanical leveling switch is too simplistic. Any switch would
    need be curved (in the form of a "smile"😉 for better proportional action
    when leveling. In addition you need some sort of method for the actuator to
    be able to determine when retracting one leg would be preferential to
    extending the other.

    Third, a superior design (especially when using a narrow spread on the
    supports) is to eliminate the leveling switch and measure the pressure
    inside each hydraulic chamber. When combined with a curved (or mercury
    filled) leveling switch as a failsafe (neutral safety switch for verticle
    positioning), equal pressures in both chambers and a neutral position on the
    leveling switch would indicated a level, stable bike. A microcontroller
    could then be programmed to add one inch of height to both sides to raise
    the rear wheel off the ground.

    Lastly, and especially on bikes where size, weight and power consumption all
    take their toll, over-engineering such a simple device as a kick-stand may
    not be the best use of your talents. Follow the KISS principle.

    Good luck with your project.

    Cheers - Jonathan

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    pls check and comment on the new design of bike stand

    http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=798

  5. ...I think the beer bellies with beards would go for this...especially
    if it was chrome plated!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.