Road Cycling · Public discussion

Big Ascensions

Started by BigAscenders · · Last activity · 5 posts · 493 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
4 November 2006
Last activity
6 November 2006
Original author
BigAscenders
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
493
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. 45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

  2. BigAscenders said:

    45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

    You can't always take road-sign percent grades at
    face value. Often they represent the steepest short
    section or even the inside of a turn, rather than the
    overall grade over an appreciable distance (like
    100 meters or more). That said, I'm sure all those
    roads are quite painfully steep. It is difficult to take
    a picture that captures the steepness of a grade.

  3. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    BigAscenders said:

    45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

    You can't always take road-sign percent grades at
    face value. Often they represent the steepest short
    section or even the inside of a turn, rather than the
    overall grade over an appreciable distance (like
    100 meters or more). That said, I'm sure all those
    roads are quite painfully steep. It is difficult to take
    a picture that captures the steepness of a grade.

    First step is to use a lens with the proper field of
    view.

    "... standard lens which produces a 24x36mm
    (1x1.5inch) negative - has a 50mm focal length. The
    normal lens for a camera using 4x5inch (100x125mm)
    film is 135mm ..."

    --
    Michael Press

  4. BigAscenders said:

    45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

    I remember that in 2002 (or 2001 ?) , some cars could barely make it
    up the Angliru in the rain, 45% seems...steep !

  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

    I remember that in 2002 (or 2001 ?) , some cars could barely make it
    up the Angliru in the rain, 45% seems...steep !

    From what I understand, the Angrilu isn't anywhere near 45%; it's somewhere
    in the mid-20s. But I don't think it's the grade that's as important as the
    composition of the road surface. I'm very experienced with Sonora Pass (in
    the Sierra Nevada mountains of Northern California), which has grades of up
    to 26% (if you take the worst lines through the steepest corners), and one
    section at 8400ft that's a sustained 20% for 1 kilometer. Last month I had
    the opportunity to find out what it would be like to climb, and descend that
    grade, in a snowstorm (snow, hail, sleet & rain at various times).
    Surprisingly, traction was never an issue. On the other hand, I've had
    problems on some local hills (San Francisco Peninsula) where the grade is
    only 10%, but tires slip out fairly easily when wet.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    BigAscenders said:

    45 percent at bottom photo...

    http://bigascensions.free.fr/loca2004/devil.htm

    I remember that in 2002 (or 2001 ?) , some cars could barely make it
    up the Angliru in the rain, 45% seems...steep !

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.