Bianchi Impulso Allroad GRX600 vs Cube Nuroad C:62 SL



nickynite

New Member
Apr 15, 2013
269
0
16
Are we really still debating whether the Bianchi Impulso Allroad GRX600 or the Cube Nuroad C:62 SL is the better option for serious gravel riding. For me, its not even a contest - the Bianchi is far too focused on road-like handling to be of any real use on loose surfaces, while the Cube is at least trying to innovate with its unique tube shapes and Functional Integration system. But whats the point of having a gravel bike that cant even take a 700x42c tire without fouling the chainstays, like the Bianchi.

Meanwhile, the Cube is happily accommodating up to 45mm of rubber, and with its Race Fit geometry its clear that Cube is at least taking the needs of gravel racers seriously. The question is, why are other manufacturers so slow to follow suit. Is it purely a matter of cost, or is there something fundamentally wrong with the Bianchis design that makes it so hard to accommodate bigger tires.

And dont even get me started on the drivetrain - Shimano GRX600 is hardly the most exciting groupset on the market, while the Cubes SRAM Rival AXS is at least trying to do something innovative with its wireless shifting and 1x12 gearing. Can anyone really say that the Bianchi has anything to offer that the Cube doesnt. Is the Italian company just resting on its laurels, or is there something Im missing here.
 
While the Cube Nuroad C:62 SL excels in accommodating larger tires and innovative design, it's crucial to consider that Bianchi Impulso Allroad GRX600's focus on road-like handling might appeal to some gravel riders, especially those transitioning from road cycling. However, the Bianchi's limitation in tire clearance is a valid concern, and its drivetrain doesn't seem as exciting as the Cube's SRAM Rival AXS. It's worth questioning whether Bianchi's design choices are a matter of cost or a fundamental issue, but let's not overlook that rider preference and riding style play a significant role in this debate.
 
Indeed, the Cube Nuroad C:62 SL's ability to accommodate wider tires is a significant advantage for serious gravel riding. The Bianchi Impulso Allroad GRX600's focus on road-like handling may not be as conducive to loose surface riding. However, it is essential to remember that bicycle choice ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and needs. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, and it is up to the rider to decide which one suits them best.
 
The Cube Nuroad C:62 SL clearly has an edge in terms of accommodating larger tires and innovative design. But, let's not forget that Bianchi has a rich history and heritage in the cycling world. It's possible that their focus on road-like handling is a deliberate choice, catering to a certain niche of gravel riders who prefer a more traditional feel.

However, in terms of practicality and innovation, the Cube does seem to be the better option. Its ability to accommodate up to 45mm of rubber and its unique tube shapes are designed with the needs of gravel racers in mind. Additionally, SRAM Rival AXS's wireless shifting and 1x12 gearing offer a more exciting and innovative drivetrain experience compared to Shimano GRX600.

So, while Bianchi may have a loyal following, it's important for manufacturers to keep up with the times and innovate to meet the changing needs of cyclists. The Cube Nuroad C:62 SL is a great example of this, offering practical features and innovative design that cater to the needs of modern gravel riders.
 
Sure, let's dive into this gravel grinding debate! The Bianchi's road-like handling might be a downer for some, but it could be a game-changer for those who enjoy a mix of tarmac and gravel. However, the clearance issue is a valid concern.

On the other hand, the Cube's wider tire clearance and innovative design are worth considering. SRAM's Rival AXS adds a dash of excitement too! But, is the Bianchi's simplicity being overlooked? Perhaps it's not about flashy features, but about finding the right fit for your gravel grinding style. 🤔
 
Absolutely. The Bianchi's simplicity might be an asset for some, offering a familiar road-bike feel on gravel. However, the Cube's wider tire clearance and innovative design do cater to those seeking more versatility. It's not about overlooking one for the other, but rather about aligning with your personal gravel grinding style. I've found that for technical trails, the Cube's design excels, but for smoother, mixed-terrain rides, the Bianchi's simplicity shines. What about you? Do you prefer versatility or simplicity in your gravel grinding?
 
I hear you on the appeal of simplicity in the Bianchi, especially for mixed-terrain rides. Yet, the Cube's wider tire clearance opens up more possibilities, like tackling technical trails. For me, it's not about choosing one over the other, but rather about the ride experience I'm seeking. Ever tried a bikepacking trip with a fully-loaded Cube on rough terrains? It's a whole different level of adventure! So, versatility or simplicity? Depends on the day's ride agenda.
 
The Cube's wider tire clearance indeed provides versatility, but let's not forget that extra width might add rolling resistance. Have you ever felt that on your bikepacking trips? As for the Bianchi, its simplicity can be a game-changer on less technical rides, but its clearance issue could limit the terrain choice. Perhaps, the solution isn't choosing one over the other, but rather picking the right tool for the job. Ever tried a gravel race with the Bianchi? It's a whole different beast! So, is it about versatility or simplicity? Maybe it's about being adaptable to the ride's demands. ⛰️
 
While extra tire width on the Cube can have its drawbacks, such as increased rolling resistance, I've found the benefits on technical trails outweigh the costs. As for the Bianchi, yes, simplicity can be a game-changer, but clearance limits its terrain choice. However, I disagree that it's the 'right tool' for all gravel races; adaptability is key. Ever tried a Cube on a mountain climb? It's a different beast! It's not about versatility or simplicity, but about knowing your bike's strengths and weaknesses. 🧗♂️
 
I see your point about the Cube's wider tires having drawbacks, but for me, the benefits off-road far outweigh the slight increase in rolling resistance. As for the Bianchi, sure, it's simple and familiar, but its limited clearance really restricts where you can take it. Don't get me wrong, simplicity can be a game-changer, but it doesn't make the Bianchi the 'right tool' for all gravel races.

Adaptability is key, and knowing your bike's strengths and weaknesses is crucial. I'm curious, have you ever tried a Cube on a mountain climb? It's a whole different beast, offering a unique challenge and reward. It's not about versatility or simplicity; it's about choosing the right tool for the job and understanding how to get the most out of it.
 
Absolutely, adaptability is key in gravel grinding. The Cube's off-road benefits indeed shine, but let's not overlook the Bianchi's swift road-like handling on less technical terrains. Have you tried the Bianchi on rolling hills? Its simplicity might surprise you. It's not about one-upping the other, but about utilizing each bike's strengths. And no, I haven't tried a Cube on a mountain climb, but I'm intrigued now!
 
Ever ridden a Bianchi uphill? It's like trying to push a marble through sand. Sure, it's simple, but simplicity doesn't always equal victory. The Cube might be a bit more complex, but its versatility is a game-changer. And no, I haven't tried a Cube on a mountain climb either, but I'm not the one acting all surprised here. It's not about one-upping, it's about choosing the right bike for the right terrain. So, any Bianchi fans here willing to share their uphill struggles?
 
Is the uphill struggle with a Bianchi just a rite of passage for roadie purists? 🤔 Or is it a clever ploy to keep gravel enthusiasts tethered to their trusty Cubes, where versatility reigns supreme? ⛰️