UK and Europe · Public discussion

BHIT and policy making

Started by Simon Brooke · · Last activity · 5 posts · 524 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 June 2004
Last activity
4 June 2004
Original author
Simon Brooke
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
524
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I thought to look BHIT up on Companies House today, and they are,
    predictably, a private company limited by guarantee.

    Name & Registered Office :
    THE BICYCLE HELMET INITIATIVE TRUST
    UNIT 43-45 FIRST FLOOR
    MILFORD ROAD READING
    BERKSHIRE RG1 8LG

    Status :Active

    Company No. :03560393

    Date of Incorporation : 08/05/1998

    Country of Origin : United Kingdom

    Company Type: PRI/LBG/NSC/S.30 (Private, limited by guarantee, no share
    capital, section 30 of the Companies Act)

    Nature Of Business (SIC(92)): 7487 - other business activities

    Accounting Reference Date : 31/03

    Last Accounts Made Up To : 31/03/2003 (FULL)

    Next Accounts Due : 31/01/2005

    Last Return Made Up To : 08/05/2004

    Next Return Due : 05/06/2005

    It strikes me that if they are anything like the charitable trust I am
    secretary of, they have members, and the members elect the board, and
    the board makes policy and directs the management. They presumably have
    a memorandum and articles lodged with companies house which would allow
    us to confirm this. They probably don't actually have that many
    members, and of those members probably not many turn up to AGMs. It
    probably doesn't cost much to join.

    Just a thought.

    How about nominating a few board members - Guy?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    'Victories are not solutions.'
    ;; John Hume, Northern Irish politician, on Radio Scotland 1/2/95
    ;; Nobel Peace Prize laureate 1998; few have deserved it so much

  2. Simon Brooke said:


    It strikes me that if they are anything like the charitable trust I am
    secretary of, they have members, and the members elect the board, and
    the board makes policy and directs the management. They presumably have
    a memorandum and articles lodged with companies house which would allow
    us to confirm this. They probably don't actually have that many
    members, and of those members probably not many turn up to AGMs. It
    probably doesn't cost much to join.

    Just a thought.

    How about nominating a few board members - Guy?

    Unfortunately a private company does not have to accept members and I suspect
    in this case the guarantors are one or two people only. You could never
    therefore get into a position of being able to attend an AGM or nominate
    anyone to the Board. If they were a public company it would be different.

    Tony

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven

    (') said:
    Simon Brooke said:


    It strikes me that if they are anything like the charitable trust I
    am secretary of, they have members, and the members elect the board,
    and the board makes policy and directs the management. They
    presumably have a memorandum and articles lodged with companies house
    which would allow us to confirm this. They probably don't actually
    have that many members, and of those members probably not many turn
    up to AGMs. It probably doesn't cost much to join.

    Just a thought.

    How about nominating a few board members - Guy?

    Unfortunately a private company does not have to accept members and I
    suspect in this case the guarantors are one or two people only.

    You may be right. Would the charities commissioners accept that?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    'graveyards are full of indispensable people'

  4. Simon Brooke said:


    You may be right. Would the charities commissioners accept that?

    The charities commissioners have nothing to do with a company
    limited by guarantee. They may have issues with its charitable status if it
    is registered as such and if they have breached the charitable status rules.
    In that case it would lose it charitable status but still be able to continue
    as a non-charitable company

    Tony

  5. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Simon Brooke said:


    You may be right. Would the charities commissioners accept that?

    The charities commissioners have nothing to do with a company
    limited by guarantee. They may have issues with its charitable status if


    it

    Quoted message said:

    is registered as such and if they have breached the charitable status


    rules.

    Quoted message said:

    In that case it would lose it charitable status but still be able to


    continue

    Quoted message said:

    as a non-charitable company

    Tony

    Strangely enough, I've just been looking at the Charity Commissioner's
    website http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/index.asp with a view to
    reporting BHIT for political lobbying, but according to the website, this
    may not be "improper political activities".

    However, I did come across a reference to the commission being able to
    investigate "serious damage to the reputation of a charity....." I reckon
    that continually supplying false information must be damaging to their
    reputation.

    Quoted message said:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.