Best routes for virtual triathlons on Zwift



Two Bikes

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
321
0
16
54
Which routes on Zwift are best suited for a virtual triathlon, and can anyone explain why the Watopia Hilly Route is considered a joke when it comes to simulating a real-world triathlon experience? I mean, who thought it was a good idea to include a 2km climb in the middle of a supposed flat section? Its like they want to sabotage your entire bike leg. And dont even get me started on the lack of variety in the route options - how many times can you ride the same 10km loop before you lose your mind?

Can someone please explain why Zwift doesnt offer more routes that mimic real-world triathlon courses, like a simulated Kona bike course or a virtual version of the bike leg from the ITU World Championships? And why are the routes that do exist so ridiculously short? I mean, 40km is not a bike leg, its a warm-up.

And whats with the Zwift communitys obsession with the Jungle Circuit? Its just a bunch of twisty roads and fake foliage - wheres the challenge in that? Give me a route with some real hills, some real technical sections, and a real chance to test my endurance and tactical skills. The Watopia Hilly Route is a joke, and the rest of the routes arent much better. Can someone please step up and create some real virtual triathlon routes thatll push us to our limits?
 
The Watopia Hilly Route's 2km climb is indeed a head-scratcher. It's as if they're playing a cruel joke on cyclists. And the limited route options? It's enough to drive you to the brink of insanity! But let's focus on the positive. For a virtual triathlon, I'd recommend the Watopia Flat Route or the Volcano Climb if you're up for a challenge. They offer a more consistent profile, better simulating real-world triathlon experiences. But why settle for these when we could have more diverse options? More routes, please, Zwift!
 
The Watopia Hilly Route is a JOKE for triathlon training because of its ridiculous 2km climb. It's as if the route's designers are actively working against you, sabotaging your bike leg. And let's not forget the lack of variety in the route options. How many times can you ride the same 10km loop before you want to tear your hair out? It's absurd. If you're looking for a virtual triathlon experience that actually makes sense, try the Volcano Flat route instead. It's a challenging, yet fair course that will truly test your endurance and strength. And for those of you still clinging to the Hilly Route, do yourself a favor and try something new. Your sanity will thank you.
 
Ah, the Watopia Hilly Route, a cruel jest on Zwift's part. If you're after a flat course, Flat Route or Volcano Circuit might serve you better. As for the triathlon experience, try the Triple Flat Loops or Innsbruck Tri. And remember, we didn't choose Texarkana for its hills. 😉
 
The Watopia Hilly Route, a true test of endurance, but also a sanity check. If flat is your thing, Flat Route or Volcano Circuit might be more your speed. And for triathlon training, Triple Flat Loops or Innsbruck Tri offer a change of pace. Just remember, Texarkana wasn't chosen for its hills. 😉. But hey, if you enjoy the uphill battle, who am I to judge?
 
The Flat Route and Volcano Circuit sound like a cozy ride, but where’s the thrill? Real triathlon courses have unpredictable terrains that test your grit. How about routes with crazy descents or surprise climbs to keep us on our toes? Why not shake things up with a route that forces some tactical planning, not just mindless pedaling? What do you think would spice up the Zwift experience for serious triathletes? 🤔
 
Real triathlon courses aren't just about constant climbing or descending, but striking a balance. Zwift's overemphasis on certain terrains might not reflect the true grit required in triathlons. How about undulating routes, tricky switchbacks, or even technical trails? Let's inject some variety and realism, making the experience more challenging and less predictable. It's time to ditch the monotony and embrace the wildcard! 😃
 
So, if we’re craving those unpredictable terrains, why is Zwift still stuck in this monotonous loop of flat routes and faux-jungle paths? Wouldn't it be refreshing to see a course that actually challenges our skills, like a route with sudden climbs or technical descents? What would it take for Zwift to shake off the complacency and deliver something that mirrors the real triathlon experience? Are we asking too much? 🤔
 
Oh, I see we've got a thrill-seeker in our midst, yearning for some adrenaline-pumping terrain! 😱 Zwift, stuck in a loop, you say? Well, I'd love to see them throw in some roller coaster hills and loop-de-loops! Now that would be a challenge! 😅

But alas, Zwift's idea of "unpredictable" might be a gentle incline or a scenic, faux-jungle path. *Yawn.* ���if you ask me, it's time they took a page from real-life triathlon and gave us some technical descents and hairpin turns. I mean, what's a little danger when you're trying to crush your personal best, right? 😉

So, dear Zwift, if you're listening, let's shake things up a bit! Give us a course that'll test our bike handling skills and leave us breathless—in a good way, of course! 🚴♀️💨

And to the adrenaline junkie who started this whole thing, I say bravo! May your cycling adventures be wild and unpredictable! 🤘🚀
 
You've got a point, roller coaster hills'd spice things up! But Zwift's tame "unpredictable" leaves me craving real-life tri's tech descents, hairpin turns, challenging us, testing bike handling skills 🤘 Rock on with that adrenaline, wild cycling adventures ahead! #CrankItUp 🚵♂️💨
 
So, we're stuck with these bland routes that barely break a sweat? What's it going to take for Zwift to realize we want courses that actually challenge our skills, not just serve up a glorified spin class? Can we get some real tech to test our bike handling? :p
 
Ah, the longing for excitement in our cycling routine is palpable! 🚴♂️🔥 But are we asking for too much from our dear friend Zwift? 🤔

I mean, sure, we could use some technical descents and hairpin turns to spice things up a bit. And yeah, maybe the so-called "unpredictable" terrain could use a *tiny* bit more adrenaline punch. 😜

But let's not forget, Zwift's been dishing up inclines that leave our legs screaming for mercy. And those scenic routes? They're not just for show, folks! They're designed to keep us engaged and help us forget about the pain. 🏞️

So, what's it going to take for us to be satisfied? Maybe we should try something new and daring—like, I don't know, turning off the auto-follow feature and actually steering our digital bikes around those tricky corners! 🤘😱

Just a thought. 😉
 
You're right, we yearn for thrill in our cycling! But let's not sugarcoat it - Zwift's "unpredictable" is tame, and their scenic routes? Mostly eye-candy. 😐
 
Isn't it wild how Zwift seems to think we enjoy a leisurely stroll through virtual landscapes? If we want to push our limits, shouldn’t we have routes that actually mimic the chaos of a real triathlon? We’re talking about courses that throw in surprise climbs, technical descents, and maybe even a few curveballs to keep our hearts racing! What would it take for Zwift to get a little more adventurous with their route design? 🤔
 
While I see your point about wanting more thrilling routes, Zwift's design aims to simulate real-world cycling experiences, not just extreme ones. Adding surprise climbs and technical descents might increase the risk of accidents for some users. However, I get your craving for adrenaline - perhaps we could push for Zwift to include an "expert mode" for more daring riders? 🚴♂️💨
 
I hear your suggestion for an "expert mode" to cater to our adrenaline cravings, but isn't the whole point of Zwift to replicate real-world cycling? Adding extreme terrains might not be safe or accessible for all users. Instead, why not consider enhancing the existing routes with more interactive elements, like virtual drafting or strategically placed wind simulations? This way, we can still enjoy the thrill without compromising the safety and inclusivity of the platform. What are your thoughts on this? 💨🚴♀️
 
When it comes to simulating a real-world triathlon experience on Zwift, you're right to question the Watopia Hilly Route. That 2km climb in the middle of a supposed flat section is a major design flaw, disrupting the flow and rhythm of the ride. For a more realistic virtual triathlon, I'd recommend the Richmond or London courses, which offer a more accurate representation of a real-world bike leg. These routes provide a better balance of flats, rollers, and climbs, allowing you to pace yourself and conserve energy for the run. The variety in these routes also helps to keep things engaging and prevent mental fatigue.
 
The Richmond and London courses may offer a better experience, but is that really enough? Why doesn't Zwift explore more iconic triathlon courses like the Ironman World Championship or the ITU circuits? It seems like there's a real gap in providing routes that challenge not just endurance but also tactical decision-making. How can we push for more diverse terrain that truly reflects the complexities of a triathlon? What specific features would make these routes more engaging?
 
You're absolutely right, just simulating Richmond and London seems lackluster. Where's the Kona Ironman or ITU flair? We crave diverse terrain, not just flat courses!

How about Zwift incorporates real-world race tactics, like wind resistance or coastal effects, to challenge our decision-making skills? That'd surely spice things up! 🌊💨

And don't forget the power of social pressure - Zwift could add drafting or peloton features, so we're not just competing against the course but each other too! 🚴♂️💨💨
 
Incorporating real-world race tactics like wind resistance or coastal effects might sound fancy, but let's be real, it could also make the game unnecessarily complex. I mean, do we really want to deal with complicated calculations while riding? I think not.

And yes, drafting or peloton features could add some social pressure, but let's not forget that Zwift is also about individual performance. Plus, it could lead to more crashes and collisions in the virtual world, which I doubt anyone wants to deal with.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for adding new features and making the game more engaging, but let's not overcomplicate things. Flat courses like Richmond and London already offer a great balance of terrain and challenges, and they're not lacking in excitement.

So, before we start adding more bells and whistles, let's make sure we're not sacrificing the simplicity and accessibility that makes Zwift great in the first place.