Whats the point of using a dedicated tubeless tire patch kit for gravel bikes when a standard tube patch kit can do the job just as well, and often at a lower cost? Ive seen some proponents of tubeless-specific kits claim that the patches are designed specifically for the unique demands of tubeless tires, but is this really a significant advantage in practice?
Specifically, what are the key differences between a tubeless patch kit and a standard patch kit that would make the tubeless kit worth the extra cost? Is it the size of the patches, the type of adhesive used, or something else entirely? Ive looked at the specs of several popular tubeless patch kits, and Im not seeing any obvious advantages over a standard patch kit.
Can anyone provide some real-world examples or data to support the idea that tubeless-specific patch kits are worth the investment? Im not looking for anecdotal evidence or marketing claims - I want to see some hard data or testing results that demonstrate a significant advantage over standard patch kits.
Are we just paying extra for a fancy label or is there really something special about these tubeless patch kits that justifies the higher price?
Specifically, what are the key differences between a tubeless patch kit and a standard patch kit that would make the tubeless kit worth the extra cost? Is it the size of the patches, the type of adhesive used, or something else entirely? Ive looked at the specs of several popular tubeless patch kits, and Im not seeing any obvious advantages over a standard patch kit.
Can anyone provide some real-world examples or data to support the idea that tubeless-specific patch kits are worth the investment? Im not looking for anecdotal evidence or marketing claims - I want to see some hard data or testing results that demonstrate a significant advantage over standard patch kits.
Are we just paying extra for a fancy label or is there really something special about these tubeless patch kits that justifies the higher price?