I saw a Hinault inseam/crank arm length chart from his book years ago. He said that he recommends using slightly longer cranks than are "typical".
Can anyone tell me what he recommends for crank length for various inseam lengths?
THANX
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Cycling Training · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
I saw a Hinault inseam/crank arm length chart from his book years ago. He said that he recommends using slightly longer cranks than are "typical".
Can anyone tell me what he recommends for crank length for various inseam lengths?
THANX
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TiMan
[B]I saw a Hinault inseam/crank arm length chart from his book years ago. He said that he recommends using slightly longer cranks than are "typical".
Can anyone tell me what he recommends for crank length for various inseam lengths?
=============================================
from 74 to 80 cm 170 mm
from 81 86 172.5
from 87 93 175
more daring
from 74 to 77 cm 170 mm
78 to 81 172.5
82 85 175
86 89 177.5
90 93 180
Additionally...
Hinault's inseam is 83cm, the seat tube of his bikes were 53.5cm c-c, and he rode 172.5mm cranks in regular stages and 175cm cranks in time trials and mountains.
Quoted post said:Originally posted by Ted B
Additionally...
Hinault's inseam is 83cm, the seat tube of his bikes were 53.5cm c-c, and he rode 172.5mm cranks in regular stages and 175cm cranks in time trials and mountains.
============================================================================================
That book is probably one of the best on cycling. It gave me the
vital clue which was necessary to solve the mystery of Anquetil's
mysterious pedaling style.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.