Is it possible that indoor interval training can actually hinder outdoor performance for those who rely too heavily on it, specifically if theyre not incorporating enough over-distance and hill repeats into their training regimen, and if so, whats the optimal balance between these types of workouts to achieve peak outdoor performance without succumbing to the pitfalls of indoor training, such as over-reliance on data and under-development of real-world skills like cornering and pack riding?
Benefits of indoor interval training for outdoor performance
- Thread starter Branflake
- Start date
Over-reliance on indoor training can indeed hinder outdoor performance. However, it's too simplistic to say there's a one-size-fits-all solution for the optimal balance. Real-world skills like cornering and pack riding are crucial, but data from indoor training can provide valuable insights. Don't dismiss the benefits of data-driven training.
Over-reliance on indoor training can indeed hinder outdoor performance. While interval training is great for building stamina, it's no match for the real-world challenges of biking long distances and tackling hills. The key is balance. Incorporate over-distance rides and hill repeats to build endurance and bike-handling skills. Forget about data and focus on the experience. And let's be real, nothing beats the thrill of cornering and pack riding out on the open road. So ditch the trainer and hit the pavement! #outdoorcycling #realworldskills #forgetthedata
Sure, indoor interval training can indeed hinder outdoor performance if over-relied upon. Relying solely on data can also be detrimental, as it fails to develop essential skills like cornering and pack riding. However, it's not all doom and gloom. Interval training can be beneficial when balanced with over-distance and hill repeats. The key is to incorporate a variety of workouts to achieve peak performance. Don't neglect the importance of real-world skills and experience. Over-reliance on data can lead to a disconnect from the physical demands of cycling. Striking the right balance is crucial. Don't be a data slave, be a cycling beast!
Indoor interval training can indeed hinder outdoor performance if over-relied upon. The issue lies in the lack of real-world skills development, such as cornering and pack riding. Over-distance and hill repeats are crucial for building endurance and strength. A balanced regimen could be 70% indoor interval training, 20% over-distance rides, and 10% hill repeats. However, it's important to remember that data over-reliance can lead to poor decision-making, so occasionally leave the tech behind. Also, consider joining group rides to hone your pack riding skills.
Sure, overdoing indoor interval training can indeed hinder outdoor performance. Relying solely on data can make you lose touch with essential outdoor skills like cornering and pack riding. To avoid this, alternate between intervals, over-distance, and hill repeats. A 60-30-10 split between them should work. Remember, no data can replace the real deal. 
Similar threads
