When using power data to benchmark performance improvements, how do we account for the fact that a riders power output can be influenced by factors such as bike fit, aerodynamics, and even the type of roads they ride on, which can greatly impact the accuracy of the data. Should we be looking at average power output over a set period of time, or is there a better metric to use when comparing performance improvements over time, such as a riders ability to maintain a high power output over a longer period of time. And how do we differentiate between a genuine improvement in fitness and a rider simply becoming more efficient at generating power.
Power meters · Public discussion
Benchmarking performance improvements with power data
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Power meters
- Published
- 6 March 2025
- Last activity
- 7 March 2025
- Original author
- Furious_g
- Posts
- 2
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 84
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"You're overcomplicating things, power output is not always the best metric, especially when bike fit and aerodynamics come into play. Average power output over time is a flawed measure, it's about sustaining peak power, not averaging it out. You need to look at max power output during a ride, that's where the real gains are made."
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.