As the title suggests I'm a beginner triathlete looking to buy my first road bike (I'll put clip-on areobars... not ready for a time trial bike yet). I've done a bunch of marathons and I used to be a very competitive swimmer so, with a bit of training, I expect to have some pretty good finishes.
I'm going to end up buying my bike used and am trying to keep my budget for the bike itself under $700. I've been fitted at 2 bike shops and both come out as 60cm.
My big question I guess is whether an older bike such as this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=98084&item=7161503626&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW
would be worth buying or if something newer like a Trek 1000 or a Felt F-80 (or 90) is far superior thos the older bikes.
Remember - I'm just getting into this and I've never been a cyclist before. I'm not going to notice the differene between $100 gears or $500 gears, etc... nor do I care at this point about having cool stuff or looking the part. I'm also most likely not be going to be upgrading any components on whatever bike I buy.
If I end up really liking the sport or cycling itself, I'll buy myself a new, really nice bike once I complete the 3 triathlons I'm currently signed up for over the next year. So again... is it actually worth my $700 or is something like the older bike going to do fine for me with little or no difference for a beginning rider?