General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Bargains? - Somerfield

Started by Daytona · · Last activity · 3 posts · 227 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 May 2005
Last activity
23 May 2005
Original author
Daytona
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
227
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Somerfield are stocking budget outdoors goods from Tchibo
    <URL:http://www.tchibo.co.uk/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/uk/-/GBP/TdUkBrowseCatalog-Start;sid=4UGJnIYkgbmJmcSpAreD-IWwq7xkALA2E_w=?CategoryName=phase_3>

    I had a quick look at the £40 50+10 rucksack and it seemed well made
    and well padded to my all be it inexperienced eye.

    Daytona

  2. "Daytona" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Somerfield are stocking budget outdoors goods from Tchibo
    <URL:http://www.tchibo.co.uk/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/uk/-/GBP/TdUkBrowseCatalog-Start;sid=4UGJnIYkgbmJmcSpAreD-IWwq7xkALA2E_w=?CategoryName=phase_3>

    I had a quick look at the £40 50+10 rucksack and it seemed well made
    and well padded to my all be it inexperienced eye.

    Daytona

    Looks like a very descent ruckack. Personnally, I'd have prefered 60 + 10
    litre, as a 50 + 10 is smallish for backpacking in anything but very hot
    weather, but too large for Winter day trips.

    I bought my 70 litre from Aldi a few years ago for £15 and it's has good
    service and has lasted. Minus points are it's too heavy and it has too many
    straps and zips.

    Jhimmy.

  3. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    Somerfield are stocking budget outdoors goods from Tchibo
    <URL:http://www.tchibo.co.uk/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/uk/-/GBP/TdUkBrowseCatalog-Start;sid=4UGJnIYkgbmJmcSpAreD-IWwq7xkALA2E_w=?CategoryName=phase_3>


    Flippin' 'eck! Allow me to recommend http://tinyurl.com, who
    will happily turn the above nonsense into this:

    The above nonsense is the standard way to define hyperlinks as defined
    by RFC 1738. If double clicking the link does not send you to the page
    then your browser is not compatible. Similarly if the link gets
    wrapped, which from your reply, appears not to be the case. I'm well
    aware of TinyURL and the like, but choose not to use them because
    there's a standard in place. Additionally, in future, when browsing
    the archive there's also the possibility of links being rendered
    useless if these 3rd party redirection services cease to operate.

    Daytona

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.