Comments below.
"Peter Cremasco" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:07:40 GMT, "Around Australia
Recumbent Style said:You throw a skin, I throw a skin and if we all throw a
skin, the bush
would
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:be come blocked to buggery. "it's only one skin" I hear
you cry, but if you ride 5 days a week,
that's 5
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:skins x 52 weeks = 260 skins and that's just your
contribution.
Having cycled around Australia I can tell you that we do
not need that amount of skins added to the millions of
cigarette butts, coke cans,
plastic
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:bottle, babies nappies and trillions of kilometres of
toilet paper that everyone threw out thinking "it's only
one.... it won't make a
difference.
Quoted message said:
The big difference is that a banana skin in biodegradable
- very. The other stuff in general isn't.
It's not that good. I can remember many a black horrible
looking thing lying next to the road taking its time to
disappear and although it will eventually do that, so will a
plastic bag (in about 100 years or so). I think that people
get hung up on this "it's food and natural so it will break
down. Toilet paper theoretically breaks down quickly as
well, after all, it is just paper, a one time natural wood
product, but guess what, it takes ages to break down just
thrown in the bush, just like a banana skin.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Perhaps rather than throwing it out in the bush, or
getting "goopy"
hands,
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:why not carry a small plastic bag in your pocket and dump
it in there
then
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:put the bag in your pocket and dump it later in a proper
receptacle.
And then what? It gets chucked into some landfill
somewhere? I'm sorry, but I see that as being just as
environmentally 'unsound' (if not more so) as pieces of
banana skin, apple cores (which you should eat, btw) and
bread being cast around the bush. Nature uses organic
waste to recover essential nutrients for continued
processing.
Sure, but at least a landfill is contained to a certain area
(until they build on top of it and start another one) rather
than just thrown all over the place. Yes, nature does
recover essential nutrients for continued proessing but I
don't think there are many places around the city or out of
the growing areas that usually recover this from bananas
which won't grow there naturally.
Quoted message said:
However, I DO draw the line at dumping garden waste
(especially exotic plants) into the environment. So many
of today's weeds are garden ornamentals gone astray.
Yes, but on the basis of your arguments above, they are
natural product and as such should be able to go anywhere
other than a landfill.
The basis of my argument was that no matter what it is, if
we all think "its only one...." we have a problem where as
if we "control" our waste by putting it in a responsible
place (landfill), it's controlled andIMHO, nowhere as bad.
Who wants to pick a nice spot on the side of the road to
camp when touring only to find rotting bits of food and the
like? Not me, I've had my try at that.
Ooroo 4 now.
Andrew.
Quoted message said:
---
Cheers
PeterC
[Rushing headlong: out of control - and there ain't no
stopping]
[and there's nothing you can do about it at all]