General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Attention Hobbes: Ian Moir's Intermediate level program

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,114 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 July 2005
Last activity
7 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,114
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A week or so ago I reached two of my goals. A Bodyweight Clean and
    Jerk (180 lbs @BW 175 lbs) And my other goal was to learn to [censored],
    which I have, completing three sexy reps at 95lbs for a PR on the same
    week.

    Now that I believe I have the "intermediate level of technique" that
    you are supposed to have to do this program:
    http://www.qwa.org/programs/tint13.asp
    I am accomplishing another one of my goals by starting it.

    I started on Monday, and have some questions.

    On an old post Kieth suggested that the Romanian Pulls be replaced by a
    conventional dead lift. I want to keep the RP's isntead of DL's
    because they feel better to me than DL's (easier groove I guess). Why
    is it better to do conventional DL's?

    In that same post Kieth also suggested taking out presses doing pulls
    for a group 1 excercise. I'll agree that there is some pressing with
    the Jerks, and there dosn't seem to be a lot of excersize for the lats
    in the routine. But I was thinking about alternating the Group 1
    excersize workout to workout between a press and a pull, would that
    work? I don't want to toally neglect my benching.

    Also, in the Group 1-3 conditioning excersizes, there is no hint of a
    rep scheme. What rep scheme should I use? Should it be cycled?
    Should you add weight to things like Crunches and Leglifts, that really
    arn't that hard without weight?

    The routine calls for [censored] pulls and clean pulls. How high should
    these be pulled? For some reason when I pull high it strains my lower
    back, can I just pull these from the floor to where the bar hangs with
    my arms fully extended downward, up on my toes, and with my shoulders
    shrugged? Typically I would call this a power shrug. I don't know why
    high pulls strain my lower back, perhaps it is my form, probably, but I
    don't know.

    Another question. This routine calls sometimes for power cleans, and
    power [censored]. Is there a benifit to doing theses over full cleans and
    full [censored]? Is it to save the legs for the front squats that follow?
    I have spent so much time teaching myself the full clean, I seem to
    have forgotten how to do a power clean, and they don't feel natural. I
    never even learned a power [censored]. So could I just do full cleans and
    snatches instead of the power version? I believe my legs would still
    have enough go juice for the squats.

    And one last question, This routine calls for Good Morning's which I
    have never done. Would you suggest going ahead and learning to do them
    now in this routine (with light weights of course) Or substituting it
    for another similar lift and going at the perscribed intensity (perhaps
    place conventional DL here)?

    I know this is a lot of questions, and I could possibly know enough to
    correctly solve all of these problems myself, but I want input from
    other people who are more experienced than me. My kingdom for a
    strength coach.

    --Falooley

    P.S. Goodbye HST, you showed me good gains for 8 months, but my
    progress stalled out in the last couple, and it is time to try
    something new. I will see you again.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    A week or so ago I reached two of my goals. A Bodyweight Clean and
    Jerk (180 lbs @BW 175 lbs) And my other goal was to learn to [censored],
    which I have, completing three sexy reps at 95lbs for a PR on the same
    week.

    Now that I believe I have the "intermediate level of technique" that
    you are supposed to have to do this program:
    http://www.qwa.org/programs/tint13.asp
    I am accomplishing another one of my goals by starting it.

    I started on Monday, and have some questions.

    On an old post Kieth suggested that the Romanian Pulls be replaced by a
    conventional dead lift. I want to keep the RP's isntead of DL's
    because they feel better to me than DL's (easier groove I guess). Why
    is it better to do conventional DL's?

    I'm not sure they are. I was thinking more that the Chinese coach
    suggested that non-drug using lifters had to work harder on base
    strength so they did deadlifts. Either way works for me. I don't so much
    of either to be honest.

    Quoted message said:


    In that same post Kieth also suggested taking out presses doing pulls
    for a group 1 excercise. I'll agree that there is some pressing with
    the Jerks, and there dosn't seem to be a lot of excersize for the lats
    in the routine. But I was thinking about alternating the Group 1
    excersize workout to workout between a press and a pull, would that
    work? I don't want to toally neglect my benching.

    Olympic lifters get a tremendous amount of lat work in snatches and
    cleans. The lats should be spread (scapula protracted) during the start
    of the pull and then retracted at the finish. There isn't a great range
    of motion, but most OL's have well developed lats without doing
    pulldowns or chins.

    The jerks have virtually no pressing movement. Drive the bar with the
    legs and then get under it. Small amount of press, but your feet
    shouldn't be on the ground when you are doing it. You literally press
    under the bar. But the catch position gives some shouler work.

    I could see doing presses. But I can't see doing bench presses if the
    goal is OL.

    Quoted message said:


    Also, in the Group 1-3 conditioning excersizes, there is no hint of a
    rep scheme. What rep scheme should I use? Should it be cycled?
    Should you add weight to things like Crunches and Leglifts, that really
    arn't that hard without weight?

    You do 6-8 reps very light. They aren't important exercises and
    shouldn't be done heavy save that for the more important exercises.

    Quoted message said:


    The routine calls for [censored] pulls and clean pulls. How high should
    these be pulled? For some reason when I pull high it strains my lower
    back, can I just pull these from the floor to where the bar hangs with
    my arms fully extended downward, up on my toes, and with my shoulders
    shrugged? Typically I would call this a power shrug. I don't know why
    high pulls strain my lower back, perhaps it is my form, probably, but I
    don't know.

    You are likely getting the weight high relative to your height by
    arching your back and pulling backwards. The bar should come up pretty
    much straight or slightly into the body. Pull high vertically - stand as
    high as you can. Don't arch the back.

    Quoted message said:


    Another question. This routine calls sometimes for power cleans, and
    power [censored]. Is there a benifit to doing theses over full cleans and
    full [censored]? Is it to save the legs for the front squats that follow?
    I have spent so much time teaching myself the full clean, I seem to
    have forgotten how to do a power clean, and they don't feel natural. I
    never even learned a power [censored]. So could I just do full cleans and
    snatches instead of the power version? I believe my legs would still
    have enough go juice for the squats.

    Yeah, you could do that. But as long as they feel unnatural you are in
    good shape. Power variations are done to work on speed and finishing the
    pull. Your call on whether you want to do them. I do them sometimes -
    depends on how I feel. If I'm feeling a little fried I don't. If you do
    the full movement I'd do them from the hang and slightly lighter.

    Quoted message said:


    And one last question, This routine calls for Good Morning's which I
    have never done. Would you suggest going ahead and learning to do them
    now in this routine (with light weights of course) Or substituting it
    for another similar lift and going at the perscribed intensity (perhaps
    place conventional DL here)?

    I'd do either the GM or RDL here. With the good morning you train a
    stretch reflex for the second pull. With a RDL you can do the same sort
    of thing. So either one will work.

    Quoted message said:

    I know this is a lot of questions, and I could possibly know enough to
    correctly solve all of these problems myself, but I want input from
    other people who are more experienced than me. My kingdom for a
    strength coach.

    Strength is easy - my kingdom for a technical coach!

    --
    Keith

  3. Hobbes said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    A week or so ago I reached two of my goals. A Bodyweight Clean and
    Jerk (180 lbs @BW 175 lbs) And my other goal was to learn to [censored],
    which I have, completing three sexy reps at 95lbs for a PR on the same
    week.

    Now that I believe I have the "intermediate level of technique" that
    you are supposed to have to do this program:
    http://www.qwa.org/programs/tint13.asp
    I am accomplishing another one of my goals by starting it.

    I started on Monday, and have some questions.

    On an old post Kieth suggested that the Romanian Pulls be replaced by a
    conventional dead lift. I want to keep the RP's isntead of DL's
    because they feel better to me than DL's (easier groove I guess). Why
    is it better to do conventional DL's?

    I'm not sure they are. I was thinking more that the Chinese coach
    suggested that non-drug using lifters had to work harder on base
    strength so they did deadlifts. Either way works for me. I don't so much
    of either to be honest.

    I think I'll stick with Romanian Pulls.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    In that same post Kieth also suggested taking out presses doing pulls
    for a group 1 excercise. I'll agree that there is some pressing with
    the Jerks, and there dosn't seem to be a lot of excersize for the lats
    in the routine. But I was thinking about alternating the Group 1
    excersize workout to workout between a press and a pull, would that
    work? I don't want to toally neglect my benching.

    Olympic lifters get a tremendous amount of lat work in snatches and
    cleans. The lats should be spread (scapula protracted) during the start
    of the pull and then retracted at the finish. There isn't a great range
    of motion, but most OL's have well developed lats without doing
    pulldowns or chins.

    I guess I just don't notice the lat work, even though it is there.
    Even when I do rows or pullups I don't feel it in my lats so this makes
    sense.

    Quoted message said:

    The jerks have virtually no pressing movement. Drive the bar with the
    legs and then get under it. Small amount of press, but your feet
    shouldn't be on the ground when you are doing it. You literally press
    under the bar. But the catch position gives some shouler work.

    In the old post where you suggested doing pulls instead of presses:
    http://tinyurl.com/chhak

    You said something about getting enough press work, and Jerks were the
    only thing I could think of that you could mean.

    Quoted message said:

    I could see doing presses. But I can't see doing bench presses if the
    goal is OL.

    The program suggests bench presses, behind the neck presses, or dumbell
    presses. In your other post you suggested rows instead. I was
    wondering what you thought of my plan alternating presses and rows
    workout to workout.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Also, in the Group 1-3 conditioning excersizes, there is no hint of a
    rep scheme. What rep scheme should I use? Should it be cycled?
    Should you add weight to things like Crunches and Leglifts, that really
    arn't that hard without weight?

    You do 6-8 reps very light. They aren't important exercises and
    shouldn't be done heavy save that for the more important exercises.

    Granted they arn't important, but shouldn't I perform them to the best
    of my ability (heavier than very light). All the important stuff is
    done first, so why would I need to do these very light? recovery? Would
    there be any harm in cycling these from 75% - 100% of the 6-8 rep max.

    OL is the goal, but I was hoping these conditioning excercises (or at
    least group 1) might keep some of my other lifts from going to complete
    [censored].

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The routine calls for [censored] pulls and clean pulls. How high should
    these be pulled? For some reason when I pull high it strains my lower
    back, can I just pull these from the floor to where the bar hangs with
    my arms fully extended downward, up on my toes, and with my shoulders
    shrugged? Typically I would call this a power shrug. I don't know why
    high pulls strain my lower back, perhaps it is my form, probably, but I
    don't know.

    You are likely getting the weight high relative to your height by
    arching your back and pulling backwards. The bar should come up pretty
    much straight or slightly into the body. Pull high vertically - stand as
    high as you can. Don't arch the back.

    I'll try to pull high, thanks for the tip, should have seen that one
    for myself.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Another question. This routine calls sometimes for power cleans, and
    power [censored]. Is there a benifit to doing theses over full cleans and
    full [censored]? Is it to save the legs for the front squats that follow?
    I have spent so much time teaching myself the full clean, I seem to
    have forgotten how to do a power clean, and they don't feel natural. I
    never even learned a power [censored]. So could I just do full cleans and
    snatches instead of the power version? I believe my legs would still
    have enough go juice for the squats.

    Yeah, you could do that. But as long as they feel unnatural you are in
    good shape. Power variations are done to work on speed and finishing the
    pull. Your call on whether you want to do them. I do them sometimes -
    depends on how I feel. If I'm feeling a little fried I don't. If you do
    the full movement I'd do them from the hang and slightly lighter.

    I think I'll start doing the full movement from the floor like I have
    been doing, but will play with hang and power versions on some of the
    sets.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    And one last question, This routine calls for Good Morning's which I
    have never done. Would you suggest going ahead and learning to do them
    now in this routine (with light weights of course) Or substituting it
    for another similar lift and going at the perscribed intensity (perhaps
    place conventional DL here)?

    I'd do either the GM or RDL here. With the good morning you train a
    stretch reflex for the second pull. With a RDL you can do the same sort
    of thing. So either one will work.

    I think I'll stick with RDL here too, Romanian Dead Lift == Romanian
    Pull I am assuming.

    One day maybe I'll be thinking about things like "stretch reflex" and
    "second pull" For now I just grip it and rip it and go by what feels
    right, and what videos I have seen. The movements are so fast, I can't
    think about each part of the lift as I am doing it, I just have to do
    the whole thing. I can study videos but it is hard to adjust one
    particular piece of the lift.

    One thing I am pretty sure I am doing wrong is the bar does not seem to
    touch my thighs on the way up, and If I try to make it do it I mess up
    the lift. I don't know If I should address this or not, since my lifts
    feel natural without it. But as you can see from my numbers my lifts
    are pretty light, and perhaps this is the key to getting heavier. If I
    practiced the thigh-glaze enough It would eventually feel natural.

    Thanks for the advice.

    --Falooley

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The jerks have virtually no pressing movement. Drive the bar with the
    legs and then get under it. Small amount of press, but your feet
    shouldn't be on the ground when you are doing it. You literally press
    under the bar. But the catch position gives some shouler work.

    In the old post where you suggested doing pulls instead of presses:
    http://tinyurl.com/chhak

    You said something about getting enough press work, and Jerks were the
    only thing I could think of that you could mean.

    I must have been getting it confused with the advanced program. To be
    honest I don't know what I was thinking there. By all means add in
    presses or benches with this program.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I could see doing presses. But I can't see doing bench presses if the
    goal is OL.

    The program suggests bench presses, behind the neck presses, or dumbell
    presses. In your other post you suggested rows instead. I was
    wondering what you thought of my plan alternating presses and rows
    workout to workout.

    Good idea.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Also, in the Group 1-3 conditioning excersizes, there is no hint of a
    rep scheme. What rep scheme should I use? Should it be cycled?
    Should you add weight to things like Crunches and Leglifts, that really
    arn't that hard without weight?

    You do 6-8 reps very light. They aren't important exercises and
    shouldn't be done heavy save that for the more important exercises.

    Granted they arn't important, but shouldn't I perform them to the best
    of my ability (heavier than very light). All the important stuff is
    done first, so why would I need to do these very light? recovery? Would
    there be any harm in cycling these from 75% - 100% of the 6-8 rep max.

    OL is the goal, but I was hoping these conditioning excercises (or at
    least group 1) might keep some of my other lifts from going to complete
    [censored].

    No, I wouldn't see any problem with cycling if you want to keep the
    other lifts up.

    --
    Keith

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.