Atkins "obese" shots

Quoted message said:

Subject: Atkins "obese" shots
From: Bob [email hidden]
Date: 2/13/2004 10:51 PM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

business2.blogs.combusiness2blogOpen ↗

Bob

WHERE exactly were these .. obese 'shots' .. when he was alive .. ?

Just curious ..

Who loves ya.l Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! jesuswasavegetarian.7h.comjesuswasavegetarian.7h.comOpen ↗ Man Is A Herbivore!
pages.ivillage.commanisaherbivoreOpen ↗ DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
pages.ivillage.comdeadpeoplewalkingOpen ↗

doe said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Atkins "obese" shots From: Bob [email hidden] Date: 2/13/2004 10:51 PM Mountain Standard
Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

business2.blogs.combusiness2blogOpen ↗

Bob

WHERE exactly were these .. obese 'shots' .. when he was alive .. ?

Just curious ..

Apparently your curiosity didn't extend to reading what was just above the pictures on the web site.

Let me help you:

"It's hard to believe Robert Atkins weighed 258 pounds when he died last April, as the Wall Street
Journal contended Tuesday. Last February, just a couple of months before his death, I had dinner
with the diet doctor at a French restaurant on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, and was most
struck by how frail he seemed. He wasn't thin, but it was hard to see his physique exactly because
it was the day after a big blizzard and he was wearing a thick sweater. Atkins ordered fish, went
without bread or potatoes, and had cappuccino with cream. He did say something about wanting to
take off a few pounds. But we're talking three, not 50. These photos were taken for our story on
February 24, about two months before Atkins's April 17 death. Does he look as if he's 60 pounds
overweight to you?"

HTH

Let me guess. You support pernicious PETA and the wacko groups they support and the people who
distributed Atkins' medical records and the other wackos who want to ban foi gras in California and
the PCRM "we'll say anything" commandoes for a veggie-only world? Would that pretty much sum it up?

I clicked on these URL's below and they're an amazing mishmash of puzzling misinterpretation,
biblical tomfoolery, outright construction, bizarre unscientific conflations, and utterly
flawed logic.

Otherwise, the colors were pretty.

Bob

Quoted message said:

Who loves ya.l Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! jesuswasavegetarian.7h.comjesuswasavegetarian.7h.comOpen ↗ Man Is A Herbivore!
pages.ivillage.commanisaherbivoreOpen ↗ DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
pages.ivillage.comdeadpeoplewalkingOpen ↗

doe said:

Quoted message said:

From: Bob [email hidden]

doe said:

>From: Bob [email hidden]
>
>business2.blogs.combusiness2blogOpen ↗
>
>Bob
>

WHERE exactly were these .. obese 'shots' .. when he was alive .. ?

Just curious ..

Apparently your curiosity didn't extend to reading what was just above the pictures on the
web site.

Let me help you:

"It's hard to believe Robert Atkins weighed 258 pounds when he died last April, as the Wall Street
Journal contended Tuesday. Last February, just a couple of months before his death, I had dinner
with the diet doctor at a French restaurant on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, and was most
struck by how frail he seemed. He wasn't thin, but it was hard to see his physique exactly because
it was the day after a big blizzard and he was wearing a thick sweater. Atkins ordered fish, went
without bread or potatoes, and had cappuccino with cream. He did say something about wanting to
take off a few pounds. But we're talking three, not 50. These photos were taken for our story on
February 24, about two months before Atkins's April 17 death. Does he look as if he's 60 pounds
overweight to you?"

HTH

Let me guess. You support pernicious PETA and the wacko groups they support and the people who
distributed Atkins' medical records

I consider the distribution of Atkins' medical records somewhat like .. insider trading ..

Insider trading. As though it were that glossingly superficial. If people have the expectation that
their medical records will be published, they're less likely to be completely forthcoming with their
doctors. Less forthcoming, less effective medical treatment. Less effective medical treatment, more
premature deaths. Sure. Just like insider trading.

Quoted message said:

In medicine / pain / death .. though .. it .. is .. acceptable ..

It is acceptable to publish Atkins' medical records? Is it acceptable to publish yours? If yes, why
haven't they been published? If not, why not?

Looks like the argument that Atkins' records should be published because he urged people to a
certain dietary regimen hits you pretty squarely as well. You preach vegetarianism and should be
your own best example. Where are *your* medical records to document the healthful quality of the
dietary regimen? Where are the medical records of those vicious liars from PCRM who advocate
vegetarianism? Doesn't look like others are willingly offering their medical records, does it?
Wonder why? But it's ok to publish Atkins' because you fringies disagree with his assertions.
Very ethical.

Quoted message said:

I don't follow PETA's antics .. except for the naked chicks ..😉

Quoted message said:

and the other wackos who want to ban foi gras in California and the PCRM "we'll say anything"
commandoes for a veggie-only world?

Saying things which can be PROVEN incorrect .. scientifically .. can be .. detrimental ..

Go to the Chung school of cryptic, meaningless one-liners? Lose the double-dots and write sentences.
You'll look less incoherent and maybe convince somebody of something.

Saying that humans are vegetarians by nature can and has been demonstrated to be irrevocably wrong.
Dentition, digestive system, metabolic functions, enzymatic utility, vitamin and amino acid needs
all point to omnivorous evolution. Our closest primate relatives are omnivorous. Our anthropological
history is omnivorous.

So what's detrimental and to whom?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Would that pretty much sum it up?

No ..

Quoted message said:

I clicked on these URL's below and they're an amazing mishmash of puzzling misinterpretation,
biblical tomfoolery, outright construction, bizarre unscientific conflations, and utterly
flawed logic.

Your comprehension is .. flawless ..

Your information isn't. And that's *not* funny.

Quoted message said:

Now THAT was funny ..

Quoted message said:

Otherwise, the colors were pretty.

Bob

Anything to lighten up your life .. buddyyy ..

Better if there were facts to do that.

Bob