General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Article: Sex and the X

Started by Robert Karl Sto · · Last activity · 1 post · 324 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 February 2004
Last activity
3 February 2004
Original author
Robert Karl Sto
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
324
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The X chromosome generates and receives more new genes by retrotransposition than autosomes By
    Cathy Holding

    of the autosome.

    In January 30 Science, J. Emerson and colleagues at the University of Chicago examined gene movement
    and observed that a disproportionate number

    chromosome, ignored the Y, and relocated to autosomes to function in a male

    relocated to the X chromosome (Science, 303:537-540, 2004).

    "This was really unexpected," Manyuan Long, the team leader, told The Scientist. "An excessive
    number of genes show a trend to avoid being linked to the X chromosome and have evolved new
    male-specific expression patterns on the autosome. On the other hand, genes move to the X
    chromosome to avoid

    he said.

    In 2002, the team reported unexpected unidirectional gene movement from the X chromosome to
    autosomes in fruit flies. In this study, the team screened the human genome databases for annotated
    genes with functional retrotranspositions on different chromosomes and found 94 functional
    retroposed gene pairs that were not on the same chromosome. Similar screening in the mouse revealed
    105 such gene pairs. Their analyses showed that the X chromosome generates an almost 300% excess of
    retrogenes compared with autosomes in humans, and 305% in the mouse.

    gene is trying to abandon the X chromosome for an autosome, what is the point of having the X and
    the Y? This is completely different to previous speculation."

    Read the rest at The Scientist.com biomedcentral.com01

    Comment: By and by, Y goes awry: why?

    Posted by Robert Karl Stonjek.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.