General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Article: "Flabbier flyers fuel cost hike"

Started by Bev-Ann · · Last activity · 4 posts · 325 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 November 2004
Last activity
6 November 2004
Original author
Bev-Ann
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
325
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This article appeared to today's Calgary Sun online edition:

    Quoted message said:



    Fri, November 5, 2004
    Flabbier flyers fuel cost hike
    By AP

    ATLANTA -- Heavy suitcases aren't the only things weighing down airplanes
    and requiring them to burn more fuel, pushing up the cost of flights. A new
    U.S. government study reveals airlines increasingly have to worry more
    about the weight of their passengers.

    America's growing waistlines are hurting the bottom lines of airline
    companies as the extra pounds on passengers are causing a drag on planes.

    Heavier flyers have created heftier fuel costs, according to the government
    study.

    Through the 1990s, the average weight of Americans rose 10 pounds,
    according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    The extra weight caused airlines to spend $275 million US to burn 1.3
    billion more litres of fuel in 2000 just to carry the additional weight of
    Americans, the federal agency estimated in a recent issue of the American
    Journal of Preventive Medicine.

    "The obesity epidemic has unexpected consequences beyond direct health
    effects," said Dr. Deron Burton of the CDC.

    "Our goal was to highlight one area that had not been looked at before."

    The extra fuel burned also had an environmental impact, as an estimated 3.8
    million extra tonnes of carbon dioxide were released into the air,
    according to the study.

    The agency said its calculations are rough estimates, issued to highlight
    previously undocumented consequences of the ongoing obesity epidemic.

    Quoted message said:



    -----
    Bev

  2. "Bev-Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This article appeared to today's Calgary Sun online
    edition:
    Fri, November 5, 2004
    Flabbier flyers fuel cost hike
    ATLANTA -- Heavy suitcases aren't the only things weighing
    down airplanes
    and requiring them to burn more fuel, pushing up the cost
    of flights. A new
    U.S. government study reveals airlines increasingly have
    to worry more
    about the weight of their passengers.

    Maybe airlines should start offering (or requiring?) LC in
    flight meals...

    --
    Bob
    Kanyak's Doghouse
    http://www.kanyak.com

  3. At least offering LC meals would be a good idea. Someone else I sent this
    article to jokingly suggested that they weigh passengers using those scales
    that measure % body fat and adjust the fares accordingly.

    Opinicus said:

    Maybe airlines should start offering (or requiring?) LC in
    flight meals...

    -----
    Bev

  4. Opinicus said:

    "Bev-Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    This article appeared to today's Calgary Sun online edition:
    Fri, November 5, 2004
    Flabbier flyers fuel cost hike
    ATLANTA -- Heavy suitcases aren't the only things weighing down airplanes
    and requiring them to burn more fuel, pushing up the cost of flights.
    A new
    U.S. government study reveals airlines increasingly have to worry more
    about the weight of their passengers.

    Maybe airlines should start offering (or requiring?) LC in flight meals...

    I've wondered why they don't. They offer almost every other kind. But
    when I asked for a diabetic meal once, hoping it would be low carb, it
    was anything but. As far as I could tell, it was still low fat, and
    mostly very bland.

    Rebecca

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.