Road Cycling · Public discussion

Armstrong to Simeoni

Started by Richard Adams · · Last activity · 4 posts · 355 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 July 2004
Last activity
24 July 2004
Original author
Richard Adams
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
355
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "You didn't say 'Please, Patron, may I join the break away?' Go to
    the back of the peloton and start over."

  2. He is not Patron. He is "il capo di tutti i cappi" and he behaved like a
    mafioso with Simeoni.

    For those that think it was a sudden impulse...this is what Noval (USP) had
    to say (he is a bit naive yet)

    «En el equipo tenemos la orden de saltar a por Simeoni en cuanto se mueva,
    él no puede ganar».
    "In the team we have an order to chase after Simeoni as soon as he moves, he
    cannot win"

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "You didn't say 'Please, Patron, may I join the break away?' Go to
    the back of the peloton and start over."

  3. "Alex Beascoechea" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    For those that think it was a sudden impulse...this is what Noval (USP)


    had

    Quoted message said:

    to say (he is a bit naive yet)

    «En el equipo tenemos la orden de saltar a por Simeoni en cuanto se mueva,
    él no puede ganar».
    "In the team we have an order to chase after Simeoni as soon as he moves,


    he

    Quoted message said:

    cannot win"

    So it wasn't a Lance thing, it was a team thing.
    "In the equipment we have the order to jump to by Simeoni as soon as he
    moves, cannot win". "In the team we have an to order to chase to after
    Simeoni ace soon ace there am moves, there am cannot win"

  4. Jim Flom said:

    So it wasn't a Lance thing, it was a team thing.
    "In the equipment we have the order to jump to by Simeoni as soon as he
    moves, cannot win". "In the team we have an to order to chase to after
    Simeoni ace soon ace there am moves, there am cannot win"

    Sounds like more BS.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2004/tour04/?id=results/stage9
    "Plenty of attacks marked today's fast stage but it wasn't until the
    38km mark on a climb out of Beaumont-du-Lac that Euskaltel's Iñigo
    Landaluze got away with Filippo Simeoni (Domina Vacanze). With the
    average speed over 44 km/h, the chase was on across the rolling terrain,
    but Landaluze and Simeoni were determined to make their mark.
    ....
    At the second sprint in Felletin after 77km, Simeoni turned the tables
    on Landaluze. Kroon was chasing solo at 4'45 with the peloton at 8'00,
    and the second hour was raced at the punishing pace of over 45 km/h. "

    So, who was chasing in the pelOton?
    Brioches, of course for Voeckler.
    Credit Agricole.
    Gerolsteiner.
    USPS? Nope.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2004/tour04/?id=results/livecomp9
    "15:51 CEST 100km/60.5km to go
    Armstrong and Ullrich are keeping out of trouble today, and are happy to
    let Brioches/Voeckler take control of the stage."

    OK, the outcome was that the break got caught with 50m to go. But
    that's different from chasing as soon as he moves...

    Perhaps, once the maillot jaune was in the bag, then enforcement could
    take place. But standing orders? Hmmm.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.