Are there truly different frame sizes available, or is the industry simply regurgitating the same few sizes and tweaking the marketing to make it seem like theres more variety? Every time I walk into a bike shop, I see frames labeled as Small, Medium, Large, and so on, but when I start asking questions about the actual dimensions, it becomes clear that many manufacturers are just marginally altering the same basic design to fit different rider profiles.
Furthermore, isnt it true that the most significant factor in determining frame size is simply the riders height, with inseam length being secondary? Given this, why dont manufacturers offer more nuanced sizing options that account for different body types and riding styles? Would it not be more accurate to categorize frames by specific measurements, such as seat tube length or wheelbase, rather than relying on arbitrary labels like Small or Large?
And what about the efficacy of standardized sizing charts? Are they not just rough estimates, prone to error, and often based on outdated assumptions about rider physiology? Is it not time for the industry to move away from these outdated systems and develop a more sophisticated, data-driven approach to frame sizing? And if so, what would such a system look like, and how would it account for the diverse needs and preferences of different riders?
Its striking to me that while the bike industry has made tremendous strides in terms of technology and innovation, the way we approach frame sizing remains woefully outdated. Its almost as if the industry is more interested in perpetuating a status quo thats convenient and profitable, rather than truly serving the needs of riders. Is this a fair assessment, or am I missing something?
Lastly, what role do you think the trend towards bespoke, custom frames has played in shaping the way the industry approaches sizing? Has it not become a luxury item reserved for the privileged few, rather than a serious alternative to mass-produced frames? And if so, what implications does this have for the broader market, and for riders who dont have the means to shell out thousands of dollars for a custom frame?
Furthermore, isnt it true that the most significant factor in determining frame size is simply the riders height, with inseam length being secondary? Given this, why dont manufacturers offer more nuanced sizing options that account for different body types and riding styles? Would it not be more accurate to categorize frames by specific measurements, such as seat tube length or wheelbase, rather than relying on arbitrary labels like Small or Large?
And what about the efficacy of standardized sizing charts? Are they not just rough estimates, prone to error, and often based on outdated assumptions about rider physiology? Is it not time for the industry to move away from these outdated systems and develop a more sophisticated, data-driven approach to frame sizing? And if so, what would such a system look like, and how would it account for the diverse needs and preferences of different riders?
Its striking to me that while the bike industry has made tremendous strides in terms of technology and innovation, the way we approach frame sizing remains woefully outdated. Its almost as if the industry is more interested in perpetuating a status quo thats convenient and profitable, rather than truly serving the needs of riders. Is this a fair assessment, or am I missing something?
Lastly, what role do you think the trend towards bespoke, custom frames has played in shaping the way the industry approaches sizing? Has it not become a luxury item reserved for the privileged few, rather than a serious alternative to mass-produced frames? And if so, what implications does this have for the broader market, and for riders who dont have the means to shell out thousands of dollars for a custom frame?