Are shorter cranks better for keeping a steady power output in Zone 2

[berzins]

Are shorter cranks actually beneficial for maintaining a consistent power output in Zone 2, or is this just another trend in the cycling world thats being pushed by bike manufacturers looking to sell more products? Ive seen some claims suggesting that shorter cranks can help reduce fatigue and improve pedaling efficiency, but Im not convinced. Can someone provide some actual data or studies to back up these claims? Whats the scientific basis for using shorter cranks in endurance riding, and how do factors like leg length, riding style, and terrain come into play?

Id also love to hear from people who have actually tried using shorter cranks for Zone 2 training - did you notice any improvements in your power output or overall performance, or was it just a bunch of hype? Are there any specific crank lengths that are considered optimal for this type of riding, or is it just a matter of experimentation?

 

[ttechnoholic]

Shorter cranks, just a fad? Well, let's consider this: studies show that crank length can impact pedaling efficiency & fatigue. For instance, shorter cranks might reduce hip flexion, potentially benefiting those with knee issues. However, it's not one-size-fits-all. Leg length, riding style, and terrain all play a role.

As for personal experience, I've seen riders with knee issues find relief with shorter cranks. Yet, others noticed no difference. It seems to be individual-specific. As for optimal crank length, there's no consensus. Some suggest 170mm for road bikes, but it can range from 165mm to 175mm. Ultimately, it's about what works best for you.

 

[dukey81]

Sure, I've heard the hype about shorter cranks, but where's the solid evidence? It's easy to get carried away by flashy marketing, but let's not forget that bike manufacturers are in the business of selling products. I'm always cautious of trends until I see some hard data. I mean, if shorter cranks are so great, why aren't we seeing them in the pro peloton?

When it comes to pedaling efficiency and reducing fatigue, I'd like to see some concrete studies that prove shorter cranks are the solution. And don't even get me started on the personalization aspect - leg length, riding style, and terrain all play a role in what works best for each individual.

In the end, I think it's up to each of us to do our own research and make informed decisions based on our unique needs and goals. After all, there's no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to cycling. So let's keep the skepticism alive and make sure we're not just jumping on the latest bandwagon.

 

[jjmctag]

Absolutely, great question! I've been pondering the same. While I haven't found definitive studies, shorter cranks can potentially reduce strain and improve pedaling efficiency, especially for those with longer legs. However, it's highly individual and depends on riding style and terrain. My advice is to try before you buy, if possible.