Arbitration Scenario

"Tom Nakashima" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
| So let's say FL contest the allegations to the Court of Arbitration of
| Sports and in the event they find him innocent.
| What happens next?
| Also since Phonak fired him and he if he is found innocent, will he still
| get the tour purse and does he have the right not to share it with the
| Phonak Team?
| -tom
|

What if Oscar already spent it? There is no law that says the winner has to
share it with his team. Just a custom.

I wonder what would happen if he managed to show that an 11:1 ratio can
occur naturally in his system. Would the results of any contradictory IRMS
test be ignored?

Tom Nakashima said:

So let's say FL contest the allegations to the Court of Arbitration of
Sports and in the event they find him innocent.
What happens next?
Also since Phonak fired him and he if he is found innocent, will he still
get the tour purse and does he have the right not to share it with the
Phonak Team?
-tom

Let's face it, what kind of hard evidence is he going to be able to
come up with to explain that scary 11:1 ratio and the presence of
exogeneous testosterone, there's like a 0.01% chance of that
happening. Absent that, they can't find hime innocent.

"Keith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Let's face it, what kind of hard evidence is he going to be able to
come up with to explain that scary 11:1 ratio and the presence of
exogeneous testosterone, there's like a 0.01% chance of that
happening. Absent that, they can't find hime innocent.

That's what they said after stage 16, a 0.01% chance to win the tour.
Looks like he's running out of 0.01%
-tom