Man you people have completely ruined this group, sad. All I wanted was some
info on recumbents.
Later, have fun hacking each other, I am leaving the carnage.
Ben Eadie <---- Note use of real name, I am not spinless
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Man you people have completely ruined this group, sad. All I wanted was some
info on recumbents.
Later, have fun hacking each other, I am leaving the carnage.
Ben Eadie <---- Note use of real name, I am not spinless
BEN EADIE said:Man you people have completely ruined this group, sad. All I wanted
was some
Quoted message said:info on recumbents.
Later, have fun hacking each other, I am leaving the carnage.
Ben Eadie <---- Note use of real name, I am not spinless
I would hope you're not spinless...this is theoretically a bicycling
forum, after all. <sorry...couldn't resist>
Best,
Dan
You are right; it is dead. I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! - certainly not us! From
2-300 to 1-200 to less than 100 to about 10; and 2 people ruined it
for the constant newbies. Very sad. For the 3 or 4 reMaining who were
discussing recumbents in the past: THANK YOU!
Chris Jordan
Santa Cruz, CA.
Chris Jordan <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:You are right; it is dead.
It's not dead, it's resting. ...Pining for the fjords... %^)
Quoted message said:I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! -
Google is not USENET. Google cannot control posting to
USENET newsgroups. Google provides access to USENET
content (reading, posting, searching archives,...)
Complain to the service provider of the offending posters if
their messages violate acceptable use policy. Posting the
same message over and over to different threads is commonly
prohibited by ISP and USENET news service providers'
terms of use. Posting harassing, vulgar, obscene, or abusive
messages also violates many ISP's policies.
ISPs are less likely to "enforce" topical post requirements
for newsgroups, although many have wording in their policies
to that effect.
Jon Meinecke
"Jon Meinecke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:1107438627.ee6d4ef0162fe861b918419601c6be6c@teranews...
Quoted message said:Chris Jordan <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:You are right; it is dead.
It's not dead, it's resting. ...Pining for the fjords... %^)
Don't be too sure about that. All that has to remain in place is for Ed Gin
to keep hanging around.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! -Google is not USENET. Google cannot control posting to
USENET newsgroups. Google provides access to USENET
content (reading, posting, searching archives,...)Complain to the service provider of the offending posters if
their messages violate acceptable use policy. Posting the
same message over and over to different threads is commonly
prohibited by ISP and USENET news service providers'
terms of use.
I have never done that kind of [censored] in my life. It would not even occur to
me to do it. Why doesn't Meinecke complain about Ed Gin to his ISP then?
Posting harassing, vulgar, obscene, or abusive
Quoted message said:messages also violates many ISP's policies.
I am only throwing back in his face what he originates. There is no equating
what I do with what he does.
Quoted message said:ISPs are less likely to "enforce" topical post requirements
for newsgroups, although many have wording in their policies
to that effect.
Every newsgroup I have ever seen is in violoation of that particular
requirement, so you can forget about that.
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.