Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Appolgies all around....

Started by BEN EADIE · · Last activity · 5 posts · 457 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
2 February 2005
Last activity
3 February 2005
Original author
BEN EADIE
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
457
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Man you people have completely ruined this group, sad. All I wanted was some
    info on recumbents.

    Later, have fun hacking each other, I am leaving the carnage.

    Ben Eadie <---- Note use of real name, I am not spinless

  2. BEN EADIE said:

    Man you people have completely ruined this group, sad. All I wanted


    was some

    Quoted message said:

    info on recumbents.

    Later, have fun hacking each other, I am leaving the carnage.

    Ben Eadie <---- Note use of real name, I am not spinless

    I would hope you're not spinless...this is theoretically a bicycling
    forum, after all. <sorry...couldn't resist>

    Best,

    Dan

  3. You are right; it is dead. I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
    HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! - certainly not us! From
    2-300 to 1-200 to less than 100 to about 10; and 2 people ruined it
    for the constant newbies. Very sad. For the 3 or 4 reMaining who were
    discussing recumbents in the past: THANK YOU!
    Chris Jordan
    Santa Cruz, CA.

  4. Chris Jordan <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    You are right; it is dead.

    It's not dead, it's resting. ...Pining for the fjords... %^)

    Quoted message said:

    I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
    HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! -

    Google is not USENET. Google cannot control posting to
    USENET newsgroups. Google provides access to USENET
    content (reading, posting, searching archives,...)

    Complain to the service provider of the offending posters if
    their messages violate acceptable use policy. Posting the
    same message over and over to different threads is commonly
    prohibited by ISP and USENET news service providers'
    terms of use. Posting harassing, vulgar, obscene, or abusive
    messages also violates many ISP's policies.

    ISPs are less likely to "enforce" topical post requirements
    for newsgroups, although many have wording in their policies
    to that effect.

    Jon Meinecke

  5. "Jon Meinecke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:1107438627.ee6d4ef0162fe861b918419601c6be6c@teranews...

    Quoted message said:

    Chris Jordan <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    You are right; it is dead.

    It's not dead, it's resting. ...Pining for the fjords... %^)

    Don't be too sure about that. All that has to remain in place is for Ed Gin
    to keep hanging around.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am surprised Google is so spineless TO
    HAVE ALLOWED THE DESTRUCIVE 2 YEAR OLDS!!! -

    Google is not USENET. Google cannot control posting to
    USENET newsgroups. Google provides access to USENET
    content (reading, posting, searching archives,...)

    Complain to the service provider of the offending posters if
    their messages violate acceptable use policy. Posting the
    same message over and over to different threads is commonly
    prohibited by ISP and USENET news service providers'
    terms of use.

    I have never done that kind of [censored] in my life. It would not even occur to
    me to do it. Why doesn't Meinecke complain about Ed Gin to his ISP then?

    Posting harassing, vulgar, obscene, or abusive

    Quoted message said:

    messages also violates many ISP's policies.

    I am only throwing back in his face what he originates. There is no equating
    what I do with what he does.

    Quoted message said:

    ISPs are less likely to "enforce" topical post requirements
    for newsgroups, although many have wording in their policies
    to that effect.

    Every newsgroup I have ever seen is in violoation of that particular
    requirement, so you can forget about that.

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.