Well you may only ever put your feet on the pedals and never touch the floor of your car. I tend to put my feet on the floor when I get into the car. I also tend to take them from the pedals and stretch from time to time. I also drive with my heels on the floor virtually all the time.
I'm intrigued by how you manage to stretch your right foot when driving.
Cruise control?
Cheers, Luke
-- Lincoln City 0-2 Southend United (AET) Swansea City 2-2 Southend United We went up twice with Tilly and Brush
I accept that you and Dave Larrington don't find it to be a problem and that's fine. I don't accept that someone ignorant of my situation says I'm wrong in doing what I feel is safest for me and others.
I don't think anyone is saying you are wrong for making the own choices, just wrong that driving barefoot is a problem.
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
"Chris Eilbeck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> I said, as I have before, this is my position, this is why I think > this. You've said no, it's like this, you must accept my view. I > do not accept your view. I will not stop wearing shoes because you > think it's safe for me to drive that way.
I'm not asking you to do that. I'm asking you to consider the fact that your proposed mechanism for stones getting in the way can't actually happen.
Well you may only ever put your feet on the pedals and never touch the floor of your car. I tend to put my feet on the floor when I get into the car. I also tend to take them from the pedals and stretch from time to time. I also drive with my heels on the floor virtually all the time.
Now tell me, is it still impossible to get a stone on the bottom of my foot?
Thanks for finally offering something to discuss.
Yes, my heels stay on the floor too. But the proposed danger is the stone sticking to the feet such that it would cause pain when pressing the brakes in a hurry - in that situation, would you be pressing the brakes with the front of the foot or the heel? The front of the foot isn't the bit potentially picking up stones, and it is the bit used for emergency braking.
The bit of my foot I press the throttle with is not the same as the bit I press the brakes with. Not all cars have throttles hinged at the top.
Quoted message said:
Thus although there could be potential for a comfort problem, or a minor irritation, there really isn't scope for this to translate into a safety problem.
(you may not feel safe driving barefoot - not being used to the feel of the pedals, or even just a vague "ooh, this feels wrong" would be an entirely adequate explanation of that.)
What I said is "I don't understand how people can..." Dave and Tony said "You can etc.". You seem to want me to accept that it must be possible for me to but you have no idea what my circumstances are.
I'm intrigued by how you manage to stretch your right foot when driving. Mine's almost always on the throttle or on the brake, and the one time I remember taking it away from the throttle to stretch while decelerating, I found it took a touch to long to find the brake when I needed it and decided that that was a BAD PLAN.
Well there are times when there's nothing in front of you within a few hundred yards and nothing coming up behind you that you might have to avoid, and you just let the throttle close for a few moments, press your foot on the floor and tighten your calves while arching your foot. Works wonders for avoiding cramps etc. just like standing up on the pedals for a few moments or shrugging your shoulders a couple of times feels good.
Quoted message said:
As such, I just got used to going two hours with my right foot in that position, then having a break.
Heels are something I seldom wore. I have little experience of driving, thou I passed my test in 1985. I don't think they'd make much difference; the pedals are usually operated by the forefoot, aren't they?
I don't wear heels much either, but I would imagine that high heels increase the distance between the point where the heel touchs the floor and the ankle joint. This would tend to make the foot unstable.
Bit like cycling in platforms, but I've never done that either, so what do I know?
SWMBO says she wouldn't but it might be OK once you get used to it.
I'm fed up with Life 1.0. I never liked it much and now it's getting me down. I think I'll upgrade to MSLife 97 -- you know, the one that comes in a flash new box and within weeks you're crawling with bugs.
"Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I think you're stupid if you ride without gloves. Gravel rash on the palms of the hands is particularly unpleasant. But it is entirely up to you.
Oh dear Simon. What's gone wrong with you today?
Do you really think I'm stupid if I pootle into town to do my shopping without putting a pair of gloves on? Coz that's what you imply above.
If you want my personal opinion, yes I do.
As what's wrong with me today, there's no 'today' about it; I've been in a positively foul mood, and utterly lacking in a sense of humour, for weeks. Hasn't everyone noticed?
As what's wrong with me today, there's no 'today' about it; I've been in a positively foul mood, and utterly lacking in a sense of humour, for weeks. Hasn't everyone noticed?
It's our age Simon. We've both become grumpy old men ;-)
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
The difference is that you want me to accept your position *and* accept mine is wrong. That is an argument, not a discussion.
Quoted message said:
Usually practical experience trumps hypothesis. If both sides were arguing from theory you would have a point but since you have only tried it once briefly and apparently didn't actually have the problems you theorise and others of us do it extensively without problems tends to indicate your theory is wrong and Clive is right BICBW
I've been watching this thread with some interest.
I think the whole issue about whether driving barefoot or not is or isn't safe/OK depends entirely on the person doing the driving.
Personally, I utterly hate being barefoot at all. I know, rationally, that it's perfectly possible to spend one's life barefoot and many millions of people have (and stil do so). But at the same time I have an irrational fear that a foot unprotected by shoegear will rapidly abrade down to the bone if walked on rough hard surfaces. But then I also intensely dislike being naked - I'm just more comfortable clothed and shod than not.
So for me to drive barefoot would be at best deeply unpleasent, and quite possibly dangerous. But this wouldn't apply to other drivers, who might in fact be more comfortable and hence in better control if barefoot.
As what's wrong with me today, there's no 'today' about it; I've been in a positively foul mood, and utterly lacking in a sense of humour, for weeks. Hasn't everyone noticed?
It's our age Simon. We've both become grumpy old men ;-)
As what's wrong with me today, there's no 'today' about it; I've been in a positively foul mood, and utterly lacking in a sense of humour, for weeks. Hasn't everyone noticed?
It's our age Simon. We've both become grumpy old men ;-)
Dammit, I'm not _ready_ to get old!
I knew I was getting old when I looked at a Ferrari and my first thought was "I'll never get out of that!" ;-(
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
Personally, I utterly hate being barefoot at all. I know, rationally, that it's perfectly possible to spend one's life barefoot and many millions of people have (and stil do so).
Having grown up in Africa and spent most of my childhood without shoes, I still love going barefoot. I still do so at every opportunity, including when there is snow on the ground. My wife has never left the UK and is dead against going barefoot, without rational reasons. So I educate my kids when she isn't looking, and guess what? They love going barefoot.
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
Pyromancer said:
Personally, I utterly hate being barefoot at all. I know, rationally, that it's perfectly possible to spend one's life barefoot and many millions of people have (and stil do so).
Having grown up in Africa and spent most of my childhood without shoes, I still love going barefoot. I still do so at every opportunity, including when there is snow on the ground. My wife has never left the UK and is dead against going barefoot, without rational reasons. So I educate my kids when she isn't looking, and guess what? They love going barefoot.
I guess it's what you are used to.
I like to feel snow between the toes too, just until they go numb that is. -- Cheers the.Mark
> and losing control? That one experience of moving a car by less > than 20ft really put me off no-shoes driving. Not at all. Don't you worry about the lack of sensitivity, the insulation of your foot from the pedals by the shoe sole, the possibility of pushing the wrong pedal and not realising until you realise that the car isn't doing what you expected? Like Mr Larrington I prefer my feet commando when driving.
It's gotta be the right pair of shoes. Walking boots are a no-no for me. No shoes doesn't feel right either.
To address someone else's point from earlier, my pedals are different, I press different parts of the throttle and brake pedal so I could easily have a piece of detritus from the footwell stuck to my foot and not know until I have to brake. If I really do *have* to brake, the last thing I want is to be hesitant because it might hurt.
Quoted message said:
What? You have to press hard on the brake pedal to brake hard? You might want to get a car that fixes that problem.
I'd be interested in a car that wasn't designed so that operation of the brake was done by the foot, which is not only as far as you can possibly get from the brain, but is also at the end of one's heaviest and slowest moving limb. Really screws up emergency braking reaction times. Doesn't say much for the intelligence of car drivers that they've put up with such idiotic control ergonomics for so long.
-- Chris Malcolm [email hidden] DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]
I'd be interested in a car that wasn't designed so that operation of the brake was done by the foot, which is not only as far as you can possibly get from the brain, but is also at the end of one's heaviest and slowest moving limb. Really screws up emergency braking reaction times. Doesn't say much for the intelligence of car drivers that they've put up with such idiotic control ergonomics for so long.
If they put brake levers on the steering wheel, it would mean using both hands to drive. How would donuts, coffee, cigarettes and cell phones possibly be incorporated into the serene glide to work?
In article <[email hidden]>, Chris Malcolm [email hidden] says... <snip>
Quoted message said:
I'd be interested in a car that wasn't designed so that operation of the brake was done by the foot, which is not only as far as you can possibly get from the brain, but is also at the end of one's heaviest and slowest moving limb. Really screws up emergency braking reaction times. Doesn't say much for the intelligence of car drivers that they've put up with such idiotic control ergonomics for so long.
If there was a better way don't you think it would be used in Formula 1?
If they put brake levers on the steering wheel, it would mean using both hands to drive. How would donuts, coffee, cigarettes and cell phones possibly be incorporated into the serene glide to work?
IV drips. Well, IV would work for the coffee and cigarettes at least: you'd need a drip for the cellphone