Road Cycling · Public discussion

Another one bites the dust - Petacchi !

Started by Keith · · Last activity · 5 posts · 386 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
5 July 2007
Last activity
5 July 2007
Original author
Keith
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
386
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So let's see

    Mazzolini - oil for drugs
    Kessler - testosterone
    Petacchi - salbutamol (in spite of prescription)

    Am I missing any recent "innocent" ?

  2. Keith said:

    So let's see

    Mazzolini - oil for drugs
    Kessler - testosterone
    Petacchi - salbutamol (in spite of prescription)

    Am I missing any recent "innocent" ?

    If, upon showing up with a medical certificate, thr Commissaires said
    "Off you go home then, Laddie. Come back when you're cured." I'll bet
    the whole lot of them would be back within the Hour with a letter
    attesting to their perfect good health.

    --
    Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply
    -
    The sheep hope the wolves never come while the sheepdog lives for the day.....;

  3. Keith said:

    Petacchi - salbutamol (in spite of prescription)

    The issue is that salbutamol in inhaled form does not appear to be
    ergogenic, but salbutamol in ingested form can be. You can't tell from
    a urine test whether it was inhaled or ingested -- but it's hard
    (though apparently not impossible) to get a urine concentration as
    high as that observed in Petachhi or Gonzalez de Galdeano from
    inhalation. That's why the burden of proof switches from the WADA to
    the rider above 1000 ng/ml, even if the rider has a prescription.

  4. Quoted message said:
    Keith said:

    Petacchi - salbutamol (in spite of prescription)

    The issue is that salbutamol in inhaled form does not appear to be
    ergogenic, but salbutamol in ingested form can be. You can't tell from
    a urine test whether it was inhaled or ingested -- but it's hard
    (though apparently not impossible) to get a urine concentration as
    high as that observed in Petachhi or Gonzalez de Galdeano from
    inhalation. That's why the burden of proof switches from the WADA to
    the rider above 1000 ng/ml, even if the rider has a prescription.

    So were back to the case of the infamous inserted caffeine missiles
    pretty much. While vibrating like a bass string "Honest ossifur I
    didn't stick nothing up my ass. I'm naturally high in caffeine!"
    Bill C

  5. Quoted message said:
    Keith said:

    Petacchi - salbutamol (in spite of prescription)

    The issue is that salbutamol in inhaled form does not appear to be
    ergogenic, but salbutamol in ingested form can be. You can't tell from
    a urine test whether it was inhaled or ingested -- but it's hard
    (though apparently not impossible) to get a urine concentration as
    high as that observed in Petachhi or Gonzalez de Galdeano from
    inhalation. That's why the burden of proof switches from the WADA to
    the rider above 1000 ng/ml, even if the rider has a prescription.

    But how does a rider do that though !

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.